Biancani, Giuseppe, Aristotelis loca mathematica, 1615

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 31]
[Figure 32]
[Figure 33]
[Figure 34]
[Figure 35]
[Figure 36]
[Figure 37]
[Figure 38]
[Figure 39]
[Figure 40]
[Figure 41]
[Figure 42]
[Figure 43]
[Figure 44]
[Figure 45]
[Figure 46]
[Figure 47]
[Figure 48]
[Figure 49]
[Figure 50]
[Figure 51]
[Figure 52]
[Figure 53]
[Figure 54]
[Figure 55]
[Figure 56]
[Figure 57]
[Figure 58]
[Figure 59]
[Figure 60]
< >
page |< < of 355 > >|
1leos imprudens me conieci? rident enim hoc Ariſt. dictum Mathematici,
putant enim eum pueriliter lapſum eſſe.
Cæterum ego pro præceptoris tu­
tela, dico eum ſequutum eſſe famam.
hæc Mazonius, quorum nonnulla in­
digent conſideratione cuiuſmodi, ſunt illa, quando dicit, neceſſarium vi­
detur, quod ea pars ſupra eam regionem attollatur, vnde Crepuſculum in
planitie apparere incipit.
videtur enim his verbis velle dicere, quod quan­
do habitantibus planitiem, quæ eſt ad pedem montis Caucaſi, vel horizon­
tem eiuſdem, incipit Crepuſculum, ijſdem etiam tunc tertia montis pars
appareat illuminata; in quo ſenſu errat poſtea in colligenda montis altitu­
dine, quamuis enim verum eſſet partem illuminatam eminere totam ſupra
52. milliaria, non tamen ſequitur ipſam ſolam eminere, ſed alia etiam pars
eminere poteſt, quod ſic geometricè demonſtrabo.
deſcribatur enim figura
53[Figure 53]

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index