Caverni, Raffaello
,
Storia del metodo sperimentale in Italia
,
1891-1900
Text
Text Image
XML
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 960
961 - 990
991 - 1020
1021 - 1050
1051 - 1080
1081 - 1110
1111 - 1140
1141 - 1170
1171 - 1200
1201 - 1230
1231 - 1260
1261 - 1290
1291 - 1320
1321 - 1350
1351 - 1380
1381 - 1410
1411 - 1440
1441 - 1470
1471 - 1500
1501 - 1530
1531 - 1560
1561 - 1590
1591 - 1620
1621 - 1650
1651 - 1680
1681 - 1710
1711 - 1740
1741 - 1770
1771 - 1800
1801 - 1830
1831 - 1860
1861 - 1890
1891 - 1920
1921 - 1950
1951 - 1980
1981 - 2010
2011 - 2040
2041 - 2070
2071 - 2100
2101 - 2130
2131 - 2160
2161 - 2190
2191 - 2220
2221 - 2250
2251 - 2280
2281 - 2310
2311 - 2340
2341 - 2370
2371 - 2400
2401 - 2430
2431 - 2460
2461 - 2490
2491 - 2520
2521 - 2550
2551 - 2580
2581 - 2610
2611 - 2640
2641 - 2670
2671 - 2700
2701 - 2730
2731 - 2760
2761 - 2790
2791 - 2820
2821 - 2850
2851 - 2880
2881 - 2910
2911 - 2940
2941 - 2970
2971 - 3000
3001 - 3030
3031 - 3060
3061 - 3090
3091 - 3120
3121 - 3150
3151 - 3180
3181 - 3210
3211 - 3240
3241 - 3270
3271 - 3300
3301 - 3330
3331 - 3360
3361 - 3390
3391 - 3420
3421 - 3450
3451 - 3480
3481 - 3504
>
Scan
Original
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 960
961 - 990
991 - 1020
1021 - 1050
1051 - 1080
1081 - 1110
1111 - 1140
1141 - 1170
1171 - 1200
1201 - 1230
1231 - 1260
1261 - 1290
1291 - 1320
1321 - 1350
1351 - 1380
1381 - 1410
1411 - 1440
1441 - 1470
1471 - 1500
1501 - 1530
1531 - 1560
1561 - 1590
1591 - 1620
1621 - 1650
1651 - 1680
1681 - 1710
1711 - 1740
1741 - 1770
1771 - 1800
1801 - 1830
1831 - 1860
1861 - 1890
1891 - 1920
1921 - 1950
1951 - 1980
1981 - 2010
2011 - 2040
2041 - 2070
2071 - 2100
2101 - 2130
2131 - 2160
2161 - 2190
2191 - 2220
2221 - 2250
2251 - 2280
2281 - 2310
2311 - 2340
2341 - 2370
2371 - 2400
2401 - 2430
2431 - 2460
2461 - 2490
2491 - 2520
2521 - 2550
2551 - 2580
2581 - 2610
2611 - 2640
2641 - 2670
2671 - 2700
2701 - 2730
2731 - 2760
2761 - 2790
2791 - 2820
2821 - 2850
2851 - 2880
2881 - 2910
2911 - 2940
2941 - 2970
2971 - 3000
3001 - 3030
3031 - 3060
3061 - 3090
3091 - 3120
3121 - 3150
3151 - 3180
3181 - 3210
3211 - 3240
3241 - 3270
3271 - 3300
3301 - 3330
3331 - 3360
3361 - 3390
3391 - 3420
3421 - 3450
3451 - 3480
3481 - 3504
>
page
|<
<
of 3504
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">
<
pb
xlink:href
="
020/01/014.jpg
"
pagenum
="
xv
"/>
of us to lament foreigners'lack of reverence towards Galileo; none of them has
<
lb
/>
reached the point of one Italian who seemed to have taken upon himself the
<
lb
/>
wretched task of stripping all he could of the laurels that embrace the im
<
lb
/>
mortal brow of the restorer of the experimental method and in some ponderous
<
lb
/>
volumes in which he set himself to weave its history, he has spared no low
<
lb
/>
insult nor poisonous insinuation to damage the dead in order to spite the
<
lb
/>
living”! The rest is in the same tone. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">I think I can identify in this harsh
<
lb
/>
accusation the echo of much of the criticism and even of the charges which
<
lb
/>
were brought against the incautious
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
rapporteur
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of the Committee for the
<
lb
/>
Tomasoni Prize instituted so few years after the breach of Porta Pia and
<
lb
/>
destined
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
“to whomsoever shall better tell the history of the experimental method
<
lb
/>
in Italy,”
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
certainly presuming that the new atmosphere would lead to a freer,
<
lb
/>
more open condemnation of the old obscurantism. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">The news that the winner was a parish priest from some little hill town in
<
lb
/>
Tuscany must have aroused much disappointment and not a little annoyance!
<
lb
/>
But actually Favaro and his accusers were not altogether wrong. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">Giovannozzi,
<
lb
/>
who has been the only defender of Caverni, also admits that “Strange and
<
lb
/>
almost incredible, there seems to linger in all this work an anti-Galilean spirit;
<
lb
/>
a subtle irony pervades it now and then, the intent to make use of every
<
lb
/>
opportunity to strip the laurels of the great old man of Arcetri, a frenzy to find
<
lb
/>
him at fault, to diminish his merits in order to attribute them to others, to
<
lb
/>
accuse him of having wanted to appropriate them all for himself.” He does
<
lb
/>
attempt, timidly, an explanation: “Who knows? </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">Perhaps he wanted to guard
<
lb
/>
against an excessive admiration or idolatry and ended up falling into the
<
lb
/>
opposite defect.” And he seems to abstain from an all-out defense almost as
<
lb
/>
though afraid of being more damaging than useful to his friend and teacher. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">
<
lb
/>
The reasons justifying Caverni only in part, but which do explain his behavior
<
lb
/>
as that of a man of terrible, albeit resolute character rather than that of a
<
lb
/>
factious priest as Timpanaro would have him,
<
lb
/>
<
lb
/>
are also mentioned fleetingly
<
lb
/>
by Giovannozzi. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">There are three main ones. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">The recommendation of the
<
lb
/>
Committee that he mitigate his opinion of Galileo must have vexed Caverni
<
lb
/>
greatly; he must have felt that they had not tried to understand his labors. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">
<
lb
/>
Second, he was immediately reminded that he had to publish the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
whole
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
work
<
lb
/>
at his own expense in order to have the prize, according to the instructions of
<
lb
/>
the testator who certainly had not imagined that publication would have meant
<
lb
/>
an expense far surpassing the amount of the prize. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">And last, he was profoundly
<
lb
/>
embittered and disappointed by the news that reached him shortly after he
<
lb
/>
learned of the prize thus conditioned, that his name had been excluded from the
<
lb
/>
committee for the monumental Galilean edition. </
foreign
>
</
s
>
<
s
>
<
foreign
lang
="
en
">This certainly was not </
foreign
>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>