Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/119.jpg
"
pagenum
="
111
"/>
few that had ſo much as ſuperficially peruſed it; but of thoſe
<
lb
/>
whom, I thought, had underſtood the ſame, not one; and
<
lb
/>
over, I have enquired amongſt the followers of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Peripatetick
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Doctrine, if ever any of them had held the contrary opinion, and
<
lb
/>
likewiſe found none that had. </
s
>
<
s
>Whereupon conſidering that there
<
lb
/>
was no man who followed the opinion of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that had
<
lb
/>
not been firſt on the contrary ſide, and that was not very well
<
lb
/>
quainted with the reaſons of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomy
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; and, on the
<
lb
/>
contrary, that there is not one of the followers of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomy
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that
<
lb
/>
had ever been of the judgment of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and had left that,
<
lb
/>
to imbrace this of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
conſidering, I ſay, theſe things, I
<
lb
/>
began to think, that one, who leaveth an opinion imbued with
<
lb
/>
his milk, and followed by very many, to take up another owned
<
lb
/>
by very few, and denied by all the Schools, and that really
<
lb
/>
ſeems a very great Paradox, muſt needs have been moved, not
<
lb
/>
to ſay forced, by more powerful reaſons. </
s
>
<
s
>For this cauſe, I am
<
lb
/>
become very curious to dive, as they ſay, into the bottom of this
<
lb
/>
buſineſſe, and account it my great good fortune that I have met
<
lb
/>
you two, from whom I may without any trouble, hear all that
<
lb
/>
hath been, and, haply, can be ſaid on this argument, aſſuring
<
lb
/>
my ſelf that the ſtrength of your reaſons will reſolve all ſcruples,
<
lb
/>
and bring me to a certainty in this ſubject.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg287
"/>
Chriſtianus
<
lb
/>
ſtitius
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
read certain
<
lb
/>
Lectures touching
<
lb
/>
the opinion of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
pernicus,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
& what
<
lb
/>
enſued thereupon.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg288
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The followers of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Copernicus
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
were
<
lb
/>
all firſt againſt
<
lb
/>
that opinion, but
<
lb
/>
the Sectators of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
&
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
lomy,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
were never
<
lb
/>
of the other ſide.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>But its poſſible your opinion and hopes may be
<
lb
/>
pointed, and that you may find your ſelves more at a loſſe in the
<
lb
/>
end than you was at firſt.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I am very confident that this can in no wiſe befal
<
lb
/>
me.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>And why not? </
s
>
<
s
>I have a manifeſt example in my ſelf,
<
lb
/>
that the farther I go, the more I am confounded.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>This is a ſign that thoſe reaſons that hitherto ſeemed
<
lb
/>
concluding unto you, and aſſured you in the truth of your
<
lb
/>
nion, begin to change countenance in your mind, and to let you
<
lb
/>
by degrees, if not imbrace, at leaſt look towards the contrary
<
lb
/>
nent; but I, that have been hitherto indifferent, do greatly hope
<
lb
/>
to acquire reſt and ſatisfaction by our future diſcourſes, and you
<
lb
/>
will not deny but I may, if you pleaſe but to hear what
<
lb
/>
deth me to this expectation.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I will gladly hearken to the ſame, and ſhould be no
<
lb
/>
leſſe glad that the like effect might be wrought in me.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Favour me therefore with anſwering to what I ſhall ask
<
lb
/>
you. </
s
>
<
s
>And firſt, tell me,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is not the concluſion, which
<
lb
/>
we ſeek the truth of, Whether we ought to hold with
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomy,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that the Earth onely abiding without motion in the
<
lb
/>
Centre of the Univerſe, the Cœleſtial bodies all move, or elſe,
<
lb
/>
Whether the Starry Sphere and the Sun ſtanding ſtill in the Centre, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>