Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Table of figures
<
1 - 30
31 - 33
[out of range]
>
<
1 - 30
31 - 33
[out of range]
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/338.jpg
"
pagenum
="
328
"/>
angle in the Starry Sphere, that inſiſteth upon the diameter of
<
lb
/>
the Star, and by the proportion of the ropes thickneſſe to the
<
lb
/>
diſtance from the eye to the rope, by the table of Arches and
<
lb
/>
Chords, I have immediately found the quantity of the angle;
<
lb
/>
ſing all the while the wonted caution that is obſerved in taking
<
lb
/>
angles ſo acute, not to forme the concourſe of the viſive rayes
<
lb
/>
in the centre of the eye, where they are onely refracted, but
<
lb
/>
beyond the eye, where really the pupils greatneſſe maketh them
<
lb
/>
to concur.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg608
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A way to
<
lb
/>
ſure the apparent
<
lb
/>
diameter of a ſtar.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg609
"/>
* Rendred in
<
lb
/>
Latine
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Corum,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that
<
lb
/>
is to ſay,
<
lb
/>
weſt.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg610
"/>
*
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
i.e.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Is
<
lb
/>
ded by.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I apprehend this your cautelous procedure, albeit I
<
lb
/>
have a kind of hæſitancy touching the ſame, but that which moſt
<
lb
/>
puzzleth me is, that in this operation, if it be made in the dark
<
lb
/>
of night, methinks that you meaſure the diameter of the
<
lb
/>
ted
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diſcus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and not the true and naked face of the Star.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Not ſo, Sir, for the rope in covering the naked body
<
lb
/>
of the Star, taketh away the rayes, which belong not to it, but
<
lb
/>
to our eye, of which it is deprived ſo ſoon as the true
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diſcus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
thereof is hid; and in making the obſervation, you ſhall ſee, how
<
lb
/>
unexpectedly a little cord will cover that reaſonable big body of
<
lb
/>
light, which ſeemed impoſſible to be hid, unleſſe it were with a
<
lb
/>
much broader Screene: to meaſure, in the next place, and
<
lb
/>
ctly to find out, how many of thoſe thickneſſes of the rope
<
lb
/>
poſe in the diſtance between the ſaid rope and the eye, I take not
<
lb
/>
onely one diameter of the rope, but laying many pieces of the
<
lb
/>
ſame together upon a Table, ſo that they touch, I take with a
<
lb
/>
pair of Compaſſes the whole ſpace occupied by fifteen, or
<
lb
/>
ty of them, and with that meaſure I commenſurate the diſtance
<
lb
/>
before with another ſmaller cord taken from the rope to the
<
lb
/>
courſe of the viſive rayes. </
s
>
<
s
>And with this ſufficiently-exact
<
lb
/>
ration I finde the apparent diameter of a fixed Star of the firſt
<
lb
/>
magnitude, commonly eſteemed to be 2
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
min. </
s
>
<
s
>pri.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and alſo 3
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
min.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>prim.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
by
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Tycho
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in his
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Aſtronomical Letters, cap.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
167. to be no
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg611
"/>
<
lb
/>
more than 5
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſeconds,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
which is one of the 24. or 36. parts of what
<
lb
/>
they have held it: ſee now upon what groſſe errours their
<
lb
/>
ctrines are founded.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg611
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The diameter of
<
lb
/>
a fixed ſtar of the
<
lb
/>
firſt magnitude not
<
lb
/>
more than five ſec.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>min.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſee and comprehend this very well, but before we
<
lb
/>
paſſe any further, I would propound the doubt that ariſeth in
<
lb
/>
me in the finding the concourſe [or interſection] of the viſual
<
lb
/>
rayes beyond the eye, when obſervation is made of objects
<
lb
/>
prehended between very acute angles; and my ſcruple proceeds
<
lb
/>
from thinking, that the ſaid concourſe may be ſometimes more
<
lb
/>
remote, and ſometimes leſſe; and this not ſo much, by meanes
<
lb
/>
of the greater or leſſer magnitude of the object that is beheld, as
<
lb
/>
becauſe that in obſerving objects of the ſame bigneſſe, it ſeems
<
lb
/>
to me that the concourſe of the rayes, for certain other </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>