Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/034.jpg
"
pagenum
="
28
"/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg82
"/>
<
lb
/>
quite differing there-from ſhould be thence produced; and if I
<
lb
/>
fancy to my ſelf a body under one aſpect, and by and by under
<
lb
/>
another very different, I cannot think it impoſſible but that it may
<
lb
/>
happen by a ſimple tranſpoſition of parts, without corrupting or
<
lb
/>
ingendring any thing a-new; for we ſee ſuch kinds of
<
lb
/>
phoſes dayly: ſo that to return to my purpoſe, I anſwer you,
<
lb
/>
that inaſmuch as you go about to perſwade me that the Earth can
<
lb
/>
not move circularly by way of corruptibility and generability,
<
lb
/>
you have undertook a much harder task than I, that with
<
lb
/>
ments more difficult indeed, but no leſs concluding, will prove
<
lb
/>
the contrary.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg81
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Its eaſier to prove
<
lb
/>
the Earth to move,
<
lb
/>
than that
<
lb
/>
on is made by
<
lb
/>
traries.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg82
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Bare tranſpoſition
<
lb
/>
of parts may
<
lb
/>
ſent bodies under
<
lb
/>
diverſe asp cts.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Pardon me,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Salviatus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
if I interrupt your diſcourſe,
<
lb
/>
which, as it delights me much, for that I alſo am gravel'd with
<
lb
/>
the ſame doubts; ſo I fear that you can never conclude the ſame,
<
lb
/>
without altogether digreſſing from your chief deſign: therefore
<
lb
/>
if it be permitted to proceed in our firſt argument, I ſhould think
<
lb
/>
that it were convenient to remit this queſtion of generation and
<
lb
/>
corruption to another diſtinct and ſingle conference; as alſo, if
<
lb
/>
it ſhall pleaſe you and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
we may do by other particular
<
lb
/>
queſtions which may fall in the way of our diſcourſe; which I
<
lb
/>
will keep in my mind to propoſe, and exactly diſcuſs them ſome
<
lb
/>
other time. </
s
>
<
s
>Now as for the preſent, ſince you ſay, that if
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
deny circular motion to the Earth in common with other
<
lb
/>
bodies Cœleſtial, it chence will follow, that the ſame which
<
lb
/>
falleth the Earth, as to its being generable, alterable,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
&c.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
will
<
lb
/>
hold alſo of Heaven, let us enquire no further if there be ſuch
<
lb
/>
things in nature, as generation and corruption, or not; but let
<
lb
/>
us return to enquire what the Globe of the Earth doth.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I cannot ſuffer my ears to hear it queſtion'd, whether
<
lb
/>
generation and corruption be in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
rerum naturà,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
it being a thing
<
lb
/>
which we have continually before our eyes, and whereof
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg83
"/>
<
lb
/>
hath written two whole Books. </
s
>
<
s
>But if you go about to deny the
<
lb
/>
Principles of Sciences, and queſtion things moſt manifeſt, who
<
lb
/>
knows not, but that you may prove what you will, and maintain
<
lb
/>
any
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Paradox
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
? </
s
>
<
s
>And if you do not dayly ſee herbs, plants,
<
lb
/>
mals to generate and corrupt, what is it that you do ſee? </
s
>
<
s
>Alſo,
<
lb
/>
do you not continually behold contrarieties contend together,
<
lb
/>
and the Earth change into Water, the Water turn to Air, the
<
lb
/>
Air into Fire, and again the Air to condenſe into Clouds, Rains,
<
lb
/>
Hails and Storms?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg83
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By denying
<
lb
/>
ciples in the
<
lb
/>
ces, any Paradox
<
lb
/>
may be
<
lb
/>
ed.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. Yes, we ſee theſe things indeed, and therefore will
<
lb
/>
grant you the diſcourſe of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
as to this part of generation
<
lb
/>
and corruption made by contraries; but if I ſhall conclude by
<
lb
/>
virtue of the ſame propoſitions which are granted to
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
that the Cœleſtial bodies themſelves are alſo generable and </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>