Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
361 - 370
371 - 380
381 - 390
391 - 400
401 - 410
411 - 420
421 - 430
431 - 440
441 - 450
451 - 460
461 - 470
471 - 480
481 - 490
491 - 500
501 - 510
511 - 520
521 - 530
531 - 540
541 - 550
551 - 560
561 - 570
571 - 580
581 - 590
591 - 600
601 - 610
611 - 620
621 - 630
631 - 640
641 - 650
651 - 660
661 - 670
671 - 680
681 - 690
691 - 700
701 - 701
>
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
361 - 370
371 - 380
381 - 390
391 - 400
401 - 410
411 - 420
421 - 430
431 - 440
441 - 450
451 - 460
461 - 470
471 - 480
481 - 490
491 - 500
501 - 510
511 - 520
521 - 530
531 - 540
541 - 550
551 - 560
561 - 570
571 - 580
581 - 590
591 - 600
601 - 610
611 - 620
621 - 630
631 - 640
641 - 650
651 - 660
661 - 670
671 - 680
681 - 690
691 - 700
701 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/151.jpg
"
pagenum
="
133
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Becauſe that the air it ſelf is not moved</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>It is requiſite then, that the projicient do confer
<
lb
/>
tion on the Air, with which it afterward moveth the project. </
s
>
<
s
>But
<
lb
/>
if ſuch a motion cannot be impreſſed [
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
i. </
s
>
<
s
>e. </
s
>
<
s
>imparted
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
] it being im
<
lb
/>
poſſible to make an accident paſſe out of one ſubject into another,
<
lb
/>
how can it paſſe from the arm into the Air? </
s
>
<
s
>Will you ſay that the
<
lb
/>
Air is not a ſubject different from the arm?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>To this it is anſwered that the Air, in regard it is
<
lb
/>
ther heavy nor light in its own Region, is diſpoſed with facility to
<
lb
/>
receive every impulſe, and alſo to retain the ſame.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>But if thoſe
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
penduli
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
even now named, did prove
<
lb
/>
unto us, that the moveable, the leſſe it had of gravity, the leſſe
<
lb
/>
apt it was to conſerve its motion, how can it be that the Air
<
lb
/>
which in the Air hath no gravity at all, doth of it ſelf alone
<
lb
/>
tain the motion acquired? </
s
>
<
s
>I believe, and know that you by this
<
lb
/>
time are of the ſame opinion, that the arm doth not ſooner
<
lb
/>
turn to reſt, than doth the circumambient Air. </
s
>
<
s
>Let's go into the
<
lb
/>
Chamber, and with a towel let us agitate the Air as much as we
<
lb
/>
can, and then holding the cloth ſtill, let a little candle be
<
lb
/>
brought, that was lighted in the next room, or in the ſame place
<
lb
/>
let a leaf of beaten Gold be left at liberty to flie any wav, and you
<
lb
/>
ſhall by the calm vagation of them be aſſured that the Air is
<
lb
/>
diately reduced to tranquilty. </
s
>
<
s
>I could alledg many other
<
lb
/>
ments to the ſame purpoſe, but if one of theſe ſhould not
<
lb
/>
fice, I ſhould think your folly altogether incurable.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>When an arrow is ſhot againſt the Wind, how
<
lb
/>
ble a thing is it, that that ſame ſmall filament of air, impelled by
<
lb
/>
the bow-ſtring, ſhould in deſpite of fate go along with the arrow?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>But I would willingly know another particular of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to
<
lb
/>
which I intreat
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
would vouchſafe me an anſwer. </
s
>
<
s
>
<
lb
/>
poſing that with the ſame Bow there were ſhot two arrows, one
<
lb
/>
juſt after the uſual manner, and the other ſide-wayes, placing it
<
lb
/>
long-wayes upon the Bow-ſtring, and then letting it flie, I would
<
lb
/>
know which of them would go fartheſt. </
s
>
<
s
>Favour me, I pray you
<
lb
/>
with an anſwer, though the queſtion may ſeem to you rather
<
lb
/>
ridiculous than otherwiſe; and excuſe me, for that I, who am, as
<
lb
/>
you ſee, rather blockiſh, than not, can reach no higher with my
<
lb
/>
ſpeculative faculty.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I have never ſeen an arrow ſhot in that manner, yet
<
lb
/>
nevertheleſſe I believe, that it would not flie ſide-long, the
<
lb
/>
twentieth part of the ſpace that it goeth end-wayes.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>And for that I am of the ſame opinion, hence it is, that
<
lb
/>
I have a doubt riſen in me, whether
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Aristotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
doth not contradict
<
lb
/>
experience. </
s
>
<
s
>For as to experience, if I lay two arrows upon this
<
lb
/>
Table, in a time when a ſtrong Wind bloweth, one towards </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>