Salusbury, Thomas, Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I), 1667

List of thumbnails

< >
221
221 		222
222
223
223 		224
224
225
225 		226
226
227
227 		228
228
229
229 		230
230
< >
page |< < of 701 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="040/01/232.jpg" pagenum="214"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              videtur agnita. (In Engliſh thus:)
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              Contrary to which poſition
                <lb/>
              there do ariſe moſt difficult, yea inextricable ſecond queſtions,
                <lb/>
              ſuch as theſe; That intern principle is either an accident, or a
                <lb/>
              ſubſtance. </s>
              <s>If the firſt; what manner of accident is it? </s>
              <s>For a
                <lb/>
              locomotive quality about the centre, ſeemeth to be hitherto
                <lb/>
              knowledged by none.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. How, is there no ſuch thing acknowledged? </s>
              <s>Is it not
                <lb/>
              known to us, that all theſe elementary matters move round,
                <lb/>
              gether with the Earth? </s>
              <s>You ſee how this Author ſuppoſeth for
                <lb/>
              true, that which is in queſtion.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SIMP. </s>
              <s>He ſaith, that we do not ſee the ſame; and me thinks,
                <lb/>
              he hath therein reaſon on his ſide.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>We ſee it not, becauſe we turn round together with
                <lb/>
              them.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SIMP. </s>
              <s>Hear his other Argument.
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Quæ etiam ſi eſſet,
                <lb/>
              modo tamen inveniretur in rebus tam contrariis? </s>
              <s>in igne, ut in
                <lb/>
              quâ; in aëre, ut in terra; in viventibus, ut in anima carentibus?
                <lb/>
              [in Engliſh thus:]
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              Which although it were, yet how could it be
                <lb/>
              found in things ſo contrary? </s>
              <s>in the fire, as in the water? </s>
              <s>in the
                <lb/>
              air, as in the earth? </s>
              <s>in living creatures, as in things wanting
                <lb/>
              life?</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>Suppoſing for this time, that water and fire are
                <lb/>
              ries; as alſo the air and earth; (of which yet much may be ſaid)
                <lb/>
              the moſt that could follow from thence would be, that thoſe
                <lb/>
              tions cannot be common to them, that are contrary to one
                <lb/>
              ther: ſo that
                <emph type="italics"/>
              v. </s>
              <s>g.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              the motion upwards, which naturally agreeth
                <lb/>
              to fire, cannot agree to water; but that, like as it is by nature
                <lb/>
              trary to fire: ſo to it that motion ſuiteth, which is contrary to the
                <lb/>
              motion of fire, which ſhall be the motion
                <emph type="italics"/>
              deorſùm
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; but the
                <lb/>
              cular motion, which is not contrary either to the motion
                <emph type="italics"/>
              ſurſùm,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              or to the motion
                <emph type="italics"/>
              deorſùm,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              but may mix with both, as
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Aristotle
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              himſelf affirmeth, why may it not equally ſuit with grave bodies
                <lb/>
              and with light? </s>
              <s>The motions in the next place, which cannot be
                <lb/>
              common to things alive, and dead, are thoſe which depend on the
                <lb/>
              ſoul: but thoſe which belong to the body, in as much as it is
                <lb/>
              mentary, and conſequently participateth of the qualities of the
                <lb/>
              lements, why may not they be common as well to the dead corps,
                <lb/>
              as to the living body? </s>
              <s>And therefore, if the circular motion be
                <lb/>
              proper to the elements, it ought to be common to the mixt bodies
                <lb/>
              alſo.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SAGR. </s>
              <s>It muſt needs be, that this Author holdeth, that a dead
                <lb/>
              cat, falling from a window, it is not poſſible that a live cat alſo
                <lb/>
              could fall; it not being a thing convenient, that a carcaſe ſhould
                <lb/>
              partake of the qualities which ſuit with things alive.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>Therefore the diſcourſe of this Author concludeth </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum