Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
361 - 370
371 - 380
381 - 390
391 - 400
401 - 410
411 - 420
421 - 430
431 - 440
441 - 450
451 - 460
461 - 470
471 - 480
481 - 490
491 - 500
501 - 510
511 - 520
521 - 530
531 - 540
541 - 550
551 - 560
561 - 570
571 - 580
581 - 590
591 - 600
601 - 610
611 - 620
621 - 630
631 - 640
641 - 650
651 - 660
661 - 670
671 - 680
681 - 690
691 - 700
701 - 701
>
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
361 - 370
371 - 380
381 - 390
391 - 400
401 - 410
411 - 420
421 - 430
431 - 440
441 - 450
451 - 460
461 - 470
471 - 480
481 - 490
491 - 500
501 - 510
511 - 520
521 - 530
531 - 540
541 - 550
551 - 560
561 - 570
571 - 580
581 - 590
591 - 600
601 - 610
611 - 620
621 - 630
631 - 640
641 - 650
651 - 660
661 - 670
671 - 680
681 - 690
691 - 700
701 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/235.jpg
"
pagenum
="
217
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
remotiores, in minori circulo feruntur? [ſcilicet:]
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Why are
<
lb
/>
thoſe near the Æquinoctial carried about in a greater circle, and
<
lb
/>
thoſe which are remote in a leſſer?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>To imitate the ſtarry Sphere, in which thoſe neareſt
<
lb
/>
to the Æquinoctial, move in greater circles, than the more
<
lb
/>
mote.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Quarè Pila eadem ſub Æquinoctiali tota circa centrum
<
lb
/>
terr æ, ambitu maximo, celeritate incredibili; ſub Polo verò circa
<
lb
/>
centrum proprium, gyro nullo, tarditate ſupremâ volveretur?
<
lb
/>
[That is:]
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Why is the ſame ball under the Æquinoctial wholly
<
lb
/>
turned round the centre of the Earth in the greateſt
<
lb
/>
rence, with an incredible celerity; but under the Pole about its
<
lb
/>
own centre, in no circuite, but with the ultimate degree of
<
lb
/>
dity?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>To imitate the ſtars of the Firmament, that would do
<
lb
/>
the like if they had the diurnal motion.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Quare eadem res, pila v. </
s
>
<
s
>g. </
s
>
<
s
>plumbea, ſi ſemel terram
<
lb
/>
circuivit, deſcripto circulo maximo, eandem ubique non
<
lb
/>
migret ſecundùm circulum maximum, ſed tranſlata extra
<
lb
/>
ctialem in circulis minoribus agetur? [Which ſpeaketh thus:]
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Why doth not the ſame thing, as for example, a ball of lead
<
lb
/>
turn round every where according to the ſame great circle, if once
<
lb
/>
deſcribing a great circle, it hath incompaſſed the Earth, but being
<
lb
/>
removed from the Æquinoctial, doth move in leſſer circles?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Becauſe ſo would, nay, according to the doctrine of
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomey,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſo have ſome fixed ſtars done, which once were very
<
lb
/>
near the Æquinoctial, and deſcribed very vaſt circles, and now that
<
lb
/>
they are farther off, deſcribe leſſer.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>If I could now but keep in mind all theſe fine
<
lb
/>
tions, I ſhould think that I had made a great purchaſe; I muſt
<
lb
/>
needs intreat you,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to lend me this Book, for there
<
lb
/>
not chuſe but be a ſea of rare and ingenious matters contained in
<
lb
/>
it.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I will preſent you with it.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Not ſo, Sir; I would not deprive you of it: but are
<
lb
/>
the Queries yet at an end?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>No Sir; hearken therefore.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Si latio circularis
<
lb
/>
vibus & levibus eſt naturalis, qualis eſt ea quæ fit ſecundùm
<
lb
/>
am rectam? </
s
>
<
s
>Nam ſi naturalis, quomodo & is motus qui circum est,
<
lb
/>
naturalis eſt, cùm ſpecie differat à recto? </
s
>
<
s
>Si violentus, quî fit, ut
<
lb
/>
miſſile ignitum ſurſùm evolans ſcintilloſum caput ſurſùm à terrâ,
<
lb
/>
non autem circum volvatur, &c. [Which take in our idiom:]
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
If
<
lb
/>
a circular lation is natural to heavy and light things, what is that
<
lb
/>
which is made according to a right line? </
s
>
<
s
>For if it be natural, how
<
lb
/>
then is that motion which is about the centre natural, ſeeing it </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>