Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/030.jpg
"
pagenum
="
14
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I do not very well underſtand the queſtion.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>I will expreſs it better by drawing a Figure: therefore
<
lb
/>
I will ſuppoſe the line A B [in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Fig.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
3.] parallel to the Horizon,
<
lb
/>
and upon the point B, I will erect a perpendicular B C; and after
<
lb
/>
that I adde this ſlaunt line C A. </
s
>
<
s
>Underſtanding now the line C
<
lb
/>
A to be an inclining plain exquiſitely poliſhed, and hard, upon
<
lb
/>
which deſcendeth a ball perfectly round and of very hard matter,
<
lb
/>
and ſuch another I ſuppoſe freely to deſcend by the perpendicular
<
lb
/>
C B: will you now confeſs that the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
impetus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of that which
<
lb
/>
ſcends by the plain C A, being arrived to the point A, may be
<
lb
/>
equal to the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
impetus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
acquired by the other in the point B, after
<
lb
/>
the deſcent by the perpendicular C
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg44
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg44
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The impetuoſity of
<
lb
/>
moveables equally
<
lb
/>
approaching to the
<
lb
/>
centre, are equal.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I reſolutely believe ſo: for in effect they have both the
<
lb
/>
ſame proximity to the centre, and by that, which I have already
<
lb
/>
granted, their impetuoſities would be equally ſufficient to re-carry
<
lb
/>
them to the ſame height.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Tell me now what you believe the ſame ball would do
<
lb
/>
put upon the Horizontal plane A B?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg45
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg45
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Vpon an
<
lb
/>
tall plane the
<
lb
/>
able lieth ſtill.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>It would lie ſtill, the ſaid plane having no declination.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>But on the inclining plane C A it would deſcend, but
<
lb
/>
with a gentler motion than by the perpendicular C B?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I may confidently anſwer in the affirmative, it
<
lb
/>
ing to me neceſſary that the motion by the perpendicular C B
<
lb
/>
ſhould be more ſwift, than by the inclining plane C A; yet
<
lb
/>
vertheleſs, iſ this be, how can the Cadent by the inclination
<
lb
/>
rived to the point A, have as much
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
impetus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that is, the ſame
<
lb
/>
gree of velocity, that the Cadent by the perpendicular ſhall have
<
lb
/>
in the point B? theſe two Propoſitions ſeem contradictory.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg46
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg46
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The veloeity by the
<
lb
/>
inclining plane
<
lb
/>
qual to the
<
lb
/>
ty by the
<
lb
/>
oular, and the
<
lb
/>
tion by the
<
lb
/>
dicular ſwifter
<
lb
/>
than by the
<
lb
/>
nation.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Then you would think it much more falſe, ſhould I
<
lb
/>
ſay, that the velocity of the Cadents by the perpendicular, and
<
lb
/>
inclination, are abſolutely equal: and yet this is a Propoſition
<
lb
/>
moſt true, as is alſo this that the Cadent moveth more ſwiftly by
<
lb
/>
the perpendicular, than by the inclination.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Theſe Propoſitions to my ears ſound very harſh: and
<
lb
/>
I believe to yours
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I have the ſame ſenſe of them.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>I conceit you jeſt with me, pretending not to
<
lb
/>
hend what you know better than my ſelf: therefore tell me
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
plicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
when you imagine a moveable more ſwift than
<
lb
/>
ther, what conceit do you fancy in your mind?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I fancie one to paſs in the ſame time a greater ſpace
<
lb
/>
than the other, or to move equal ſpaces, but in leſſer time.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Very well: and for moveables equally ſwift, what's
<
lb
/>
your conceit of them?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I fancie that they paſs equal ſpaces in equal times.</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>