Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
361 - 370
371 - 380
381 - 390
391 - 400
401 - 410
411 - 420
421 - 430
431 - 440
441 - 450
451 - 460
461 - 470
471 - 480
481 - 490
491 - 500
501 - 510
511 - 520
521 - 530
531 - 540
541 - 550
551 - 560
561 - 570
571 - 580
581 - 590
591 - 600
601 - 610
611 - 620
621 - 630
631 - 640
641 - 650
651 - 660
661 - 670
671 - 680
681 - 690
691 - 700
701 - 701
>
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
361 - 370
371 - 380
381 - 390
391 - 400
401 - 410
411 - 420
421 - 430
431 - 440
441 - 450
451 - 460
461 - 470
471 - 480
481 - 490
491 - 500
501 - 510
511 - 520
521 - 530
531 - 540
541 - 550
551 - 560
561 - 570
571 - 580
581 - 590
591 - 600
601 - 610
611 - 620
621 - 630
631 - 640
641 - 650
651 - 660
661 - 670
671 - 680
681 - 690
691 - 700
701 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/361.jpg
"
pagenum
="
341
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. No: For the point would be changed, and would be
<
lb
/>
beneath the ſtar firſt obſerved.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>You are in the right. </
s
>
<
s
>Now like as that which in this
<
lb
/>
example anſwereth to the elevation of the Top-Gallant-Top, is
<
lb
/>
not the ſtar, but the point of the Firmament that lyeth in a right
<
lb
/>
line with the eye, and the ſaid top of the Maſt, ſo in the caſe
<
lb
/>
exemplified, that which in the Firmament anſwers to the Pole
<
lb
/>
of the Earth, is not a ſtar, or other fixed thing in the
<
lb
/>
ment; but is that point in which the Axis of the Earth
<
lb
/>
ed ſtreight out, till it cometh thither doth determine, which point
<
lb
/>
is not fixed, but obeyeth the mutations that the Pole of the
<
lb
/>
Earth doth make. </
s
>
<
s
>And therefore
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Tycho,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
or who ever elſe that
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg644
"/>
<
lb
/>
did alledg this objection, ought to have ſaid that upon that
<
lb
/>
ſame motion of the Earth, were it true, one might obſerve ſome
<
lb
/>
difference in the elevation and depreſſion (not of the Pole, but)
<
lb
/>
of ſome fixed ſtar toward that part which anſwereth to our Pole.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg644
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Upon the
<
lb
/>
al motion of the
<
lb
/>
Earth, alteration
<
lb
/>
may enſue in
<
lb
/>
ſome fixed ſtar,
<
lb
/>
not in the Pole.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I already very well underſtand the miſtake by them
<
lb
/>
committed; but yet therefore (which to me ſeems very great) of
<
lb
/>
the argument brought on the contrary is not leſſened,
<
lb
/>
ſing relation to be had to the variation of the ſtars, and not of
<
lb
/>
the Pole; for if the moving of the Ship but 60. miles, make a
<
lb
/>
fixed ſtar riſe to me one degree, ſhall I not find alike, yea and
<
lb
/>
very much greater mutation, if the Ship ſhould ſail towards the
<
lb
/>
ſaid ſtar for ſo much ſpace as is the Diameter of the Grand
<
lb
/>
Orb, which you affirm to be double the diſtance that is between
<
lb
/>
the Earth and Sun?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Herein
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
there is another fallacy, which,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg645
"/>
<
lb
/>
truth is, you underſtand, but do not upon the ſudden think of
<
lb
/>
the ſame, but I will try to bring it to your remembrance: Tell
<
lb
/>
me therefore; if when after you have directed the Quadrant to
<
lb
/>
a fixed ſtar, and found
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
v. </
s
>
<
s
>g.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
its elevation to be 40. degrees,
<
lb
/>
you ſhould without ſtirring from the place, incline the ſide of
<
lb
/>
the Ouadrant, ſo as that the ſtar might remain elevated above
<
lb
/>
that direction, would you thereupon ſay that the ſtar had
<
lb
/>
red greater elevation?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg645
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The equivoke of
<
lb
/>
thoſe who believe
<
lb
/>
that in the annual
<
lb
/>
motion great
<
lb
/>
tations are to be
<
lb
/>
made about the
<
lb
/>
elevation of a
<
lb
/>
ed ſtar, is
<
lb
/>
ted.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Certainly no: For the mutation was made in the
<
lb
/>
ſtrument and not in the Obſerver, that did change place,
<
lb
/>
ving towards the ſame.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>But if you ſail or walk along the ſurface of the
<
lb
/>
ſtrial Globe, will you ſay that there is no alteration made in the
<
lb
/>
ſaid Quadrant, but that the ſame elevarion is ſtill retained in
<
lb
/>
ſpect of the Heavens, ſo long as you your ſelf do not incline it,
<
lb
/>
but let it ſtand at its firſt conſtitution?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Give me leave to think of it. </
s
>
<
s
>I would ſay without
<
lb
/>
more ado, that it would not retain the ſame, in regard the </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>