Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu. In universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagirita, 1606

List of thumbnails

< >
241
241 (239) 		242
242 (240)
243
243 (241) 		244
244 (242)
245
245 (243) 		246
246 (244)
247
247 (245) 		248
248 (246)
249
249 (247) 		250
250 (248)
< >
page |< < (245) of 990 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="la" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e75586" type="section" level="1" n="109">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e76918" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="245" file="0247" n="247" rhead="QVA ESTIO I. ARTICVLVS III."/>
            tineant vnum imperfectum.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e76969" xml:space="preserve">Hoc vt verum ſit, non ſatisfacit plene quæſtioni, & experientiæ:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e76972" xml:space="preserve"> nam
              <lb/>
            conceptus vnius membri, etſi aliquo modo cenſeri poteſt conceptus to-
              <lb/>
            tius analogi ob rationem Caietani, non eſt tamen adæquatus conceptus
              <lb/>
            nominis, neque haurit totum obiectum impoſitionis illius, quod eſt ana-
              <lb/>
            logum, ſecundum omnia membra, de quo eſt quæſtio.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e76983" xml:space="preserve"> Deinde nos expe-
              <lb/>
            rimur audito nomine entis formari vnum conceptum reſpondentẽ pri-
              <lb/>
            mo analogo communi, non alicui membro determinato.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e76990" xml:space="preserve"> Quare aliter vti
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0247-01" xlink:href="note-0247-01a" xml:space="preserve">Caiet
                <unsure/>
              .</note>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0247-02" xlink:href="note-0247-02a" xml:space="preserve">Conceptus
                <lb/>
              perfectus, &
                <lb/>
              imperfectus
                <lb/>
              quis.</note>
            poſſumus eadem Caietani diſtinctione, ipſo minime repugnante in cap.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e76999" xml:space="preserve"> 5.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77003" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            & 6.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77008" xml:space="preserve"> ſi nimirum appellemus conceptũ perfectum illum, quo diſtinctè per
              <lb/>
            cipiuntur omnia immediata ſignificata analogi;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77013" xml:space="preserve"> imperfectum, quo appre
              <lb/>
            henduntur omnia confuſe, quatenus aliquam habent conuenientiã.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77018" xml:space="preserve"> Por-
              <lb/>
            ro Ariſtoteles habuit rationem perfecti conceptus, cum aſſeruit Aequi-
              <lb/>
            uocis reſpondere plures, & meritò non curauit confuſum, quia vt Aequi-
              <lb/>
            uoca differant ab Vniuocis, quod Ariſtoteles in præſenti oſtendere cona
              <lb/>
            batur, ſatis eſt quod hæc, prout conueniunt, vno conceptu diſtinctè, &
              <lb/>
            perfectè concipi poſsint, illa non niſi pluribus.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77052" xml:space="preserve">Petrus Fonſeca non contentus hac explicatione in 4.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77055" xml:space="preserve"> Metaphy ſ.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77058" xml:space="preserve"> cap.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77061" xml:space="preserve"> 2.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77064" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0247-03" xlink:href="note-0247-03a" xml:space="preserve">Ponſeca.</note>
            quæſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77072" xml:space="preserve">2.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77075" xml:space="preserve">ſect.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77078" xml:space="preserve">5.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77081" xml:space="preserve">inueſtigauit nouum modum ſatis Metaphyſicum, quo ratio
              <lb/>
            ne illius conceptus confuſi, quem diximus eſſe vnicum, dicatur analogũ
              <lb/>
            habere multos conceptus.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77088" xml:space="preserve"> Docet ergo bifariam conceptum eſſe vnũ, pri-
              <lb/>
            more, ſecundo ratione:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77093" xml:space="preserve"> conceptus vnus re dicitur ille, qui eſt vna nume
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0247-04" xlink:href="note-0247-04a" xml:space="preserve">Conceptus
                <lb/>
              vnus ve.</note>
            ro qualitas realiter diſtincta ab alijs, vt conceptus Solis:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77101" xml:space="preserve"> vnus ratione di-
              <lb/>
            citur, qui præterea repræſentat vniformiter, & eadem ratione ſuum ſig-
              <lb/>
            nificatum, huiuſmodi eſt conceptus hominis, qui non ſolum eſt vna quali
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0247-05" xlink:href="note-0247-05a" xml:space="preserve">Conceptus
                <lb/>
              vnusratione
                <lb/>
              Conceptus
                <lb/>
              vnus re &
                <lb/>
              nõ racione.</note>
            tas, ſed repræſentat naturam ſimplicem eandem in omnibus hominibus:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77112" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            vnus conceptus re, & non ratione eſt, qui tametſi eſt vna numero quali-
              <lb/>
            tas, repræſentatione tamen exiſtit multiplex, quia repræſentat aliquã ra
              <lb/>
            tionem communem minimè ſimplicem, ſed in ipſa cõmunitate diuerſam,
              <lb/>
            & ſolum proportione ſimilem, & huius generis eſſe conceptum analogi,
              <lb/>
            quem proinde Phyloſophus appellauit multiplicẽ, non re ſed ratione for
              <lb/>
            mali, ſeu repræſentatione, quæ fuſius explicanda ſunt quarto Metaphyſ.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77153" xml:space="preserve">Duo tamẽ pro loco obijci poſſunt aduerſus hanc expoſitionẽ.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77156" xml:space="preserve"> Primum
              <lb/>
            eſt, ſi detur conceptus repræſentatione multiplex, nullam ſuper eſſe ratio
              <lb/>
            nem ob quam, idem non appelletur analogus, ſicque non in vocibus tan-
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0247-06" xlink:href="note-0247-06a" xml:space="preserve">Obiectio-
                <lb/>
              nes in ſupe-
                <lb/>
              riorem do-
                <lb/>
              ctrinam.</note>
            tum, vt dici ſolet, ſed inconceptibus etiã analogiam reperiri:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77167" xml:space="preserve"> illatio cõ-
              <lb/>
            ſpicua eſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77172" xml:space="preserve"> Nam vocabulum ex eo contrahit analogiam, quia vnum cũ ſit,
              <lb/>
            diuerſas rationes obiectiuas ſignificat non conuenientes in aliqua natu-
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0247-07" xlink:href="note-0247-07a" xml:space="preserve">Prima obie
                <lb/>
              ctio.</note>
            ra ſimpliciter vna, ſed hoc ipſum cernitur inconceptu.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77181" xml:space="preserve"> Quod ſi hoc ad-
              <lb/>
            mittatur, perget aliquis vlterius oſtendere poſsibilem eſſe conceptũ ca-
              <lb/>
            ſu Aequiuocum, ſi nimirum quis formet vnum conceptum immediatè re
              <lb/>
            preſentatiuum canis marini, & terreſtis, qui ſaltem Angelo poſsibilis vi
              <lb/>
            detur, is ergo conceptus eodem modo, quo vox, eſſentias omninò diuer-
              <lb/>
            ſas ſignificabit, quod Aequiuocationi ſufficiens eſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e77195" xml:space="preserve"> Secundum obiectum
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0247-08" xlink:href="note-0247-08a" xml:space="preserve">Secunda ob
                <lb/>
              iectio.</note>
            eſt, prædictum conceptum etſi detur, non poſſe in præſenti plures nuncu-
              <lb/>
            pari, cũ Ariſtoteles in eadem definitione appellet vnum nomen, id quod
              <lb/>
            habet æqualem, aut maiorem diuerſitatem in ſignificando, alioquin in ea
              <lb/>
            dem definitione committet Aequiuocationem.</s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum