Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu. In universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagirita, 1606

List of thumbnails

< >
251
251 (249) 		252
252 (251)
253
253 (251) 		254
254 (252)
255
255 (253) 		256
256 (254)
257
257 (255) 		258
258 (254)
259
259 (255) 		260
260 (258)
< >
page |< < (249) of 990 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="la" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e77872" type="section" level="1" n="111">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78015" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="249" file="0251" n="251" rhead="QVÆSTIO II. AR TICVLVS I."/>
            vniuoca;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78020" xml:space="preserve"> hæc enim & nomen & rationem habent eãdẽ, illa nomen quidẽ
              <lb/>
            vnum poſsident, rationem tamen diuerſam, at denominatiua tam vocem
              <lb/>
            quam rationem habent, nec prorſus eandem, nec prorſus diuerſam, vt
              <lb/>
            liquet ex dictis.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78029" xml:space="preserve"> A duerte tamẽ non codẽ modo conferri inter ſe denomi-
              <lb/>
            natiua in prædictis conditionibus, atque vniuoca, & æquiuoca, nam horũ
              <lb/>
            comparatio fit, inter ea, quæ ſunt eiuſdẽ rationis, vt inter duo æquiuoca
              <lb/>
            ta, vel vniuocata, denominatiua verò non ita conferuntur, ſed denomina
              <lb/>
            tum cum denominante, inter hæc enim eſt illa paritas, & diſcrepatio, de
              <lb/>
            qua diximus.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78053" xml:space="preserve">Indefinitione expreſſę ſunt quatuor priores conditiones, cum denomi
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0251-01" xlink:href="note-0251-01a" xml:space="preserve">Explicatio
                <lb/>
              definitiõis
                <lb/>
              denomina-
                <lb/>
              tiui.</note>
            natiuum dicitur, quod ab aliquo priori intelligitur re ipſa deriuatum, &
              <lb/>
            indicatur cõuenientia in forma:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78062" xml:space="preserve"> cum additur, habet appellationem, ſigni-
              <lb/>
            ficatur conuenientia in vocabulo, vtique ſecundum initium ſolo differen-
              <lb/>
            tia caſu, hoc eſt cum diuerſitate in fine vocabuli, & ex conſequenti in mo
              <lb/>
            do ſignificandi, ſeu habendi formam.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78071" xml:space="preserve"> Duæ conditiones poſtremæ ideo nõ
              <lb/>
            ponuntur in definitione, vt annotauit Caieran.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78076" xml:space="preserve"> hoc loco, quia ſignifican-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0251-02" xlink:href="note-0251-02a" xml:space="preserve">Caier.</note>
            tur nomine definiti, ait enim idẽ eſſe denominatiuũ, ac ſolius nominis da
              <lb/>
            tiuũ:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78085" xml:space="preserve"> explicat ergo Ariſtoteles, quo pacto ſe habeat ad formam à qua de-
              <lb/>
            riuatur id, quod alteri nomen præbet, non eſſentiam.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78091" xml:space="preserve"> Cum audis denomi-
              <lb/>
            natiuum ſolum vocabulum cõmunicare, non intelligas excludi formam
              <lb/>
            per illud ſignificatam, impoſsibile enim eſt vocem prædicari abſque ſig-
              <lb/>
            nificato, cum vox ratione ipſius ſignificati prædicetur, ſed partẽ conſti-
              <lb/>
            tuentem eſſentiam.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78120" xml:space="preserve">Ex hac doctrina colliges primo definitionem eſſe deſcriptiuam, ſiqui-
              <lb/>
            dem explicantur reſpectus denominatiui ad rem denominatam, per alias
              <lb/>
            conditiones eiuſdem denominatiui deriuatas à forma denominante.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78127" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            Colliges ſecundo denominatiuum ſemper ſignificare formam accidenta
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0251-03" xlink:href="note-0251-03a" xml:space="preserve">Albertus:</note>
            riam ſubiecto, quam conditionem Albertus Magnus conatur eruere ex
              <lb/>
            illis verbis definitionis [quæ ab alio] quia tam præpoſitio, ab, quam vo-
              <lb/>
            cabulum, alio, indicant diſstinctionem.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78140" xml:space="preserve"> Probat interpretationem Tole-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0251-04" xlink:href="note-0251-04a" xml:space="preserve">Toletus.</note>
            tus hìc quæſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78147" xml:space="preserve"> vnica ad quartum, & alij recentiores, ſed quanto iure non
              <lb/>
            conſtat.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78152" xml:space="preserve"> Nam Phyloſophus haud definit rem denominatam, quam fate-
              <lb/>
            mur habere denominationem à forma diſtincta, ſed denominatiuum de-
              <lb/>
            nominatum, vt mox dicemus, quod eſt concretum formæ, & prędicatur de
              <lb/>
            re denominata Huiuſmodi autem cõcretum eſſentialiter includit formã
              <lb/>
            à qua dicitur deriuari nomine, & re illis verbis, quæ ab alio & c.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78164" xml:space="preserve"> Igitur il-
              <lb/>
            lis verbis, ab alio, ſignificatur forma neutiquam accidentaria ei, quod ab
              <lb/>
            co deducitur:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78171" xml:space="preserve"> ex quo adhuc non colligitur, an concretum ſit accidenta-
              <lb/>
            rium rei denominatæ, quare magis probanda eſt interpretatio Caietani
              <lb/>
            proxime adducta.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78191" xml:space="preserve">Colliges tertio non eſſe probandam ſententiã Marſilij, & Aegydij exiſ-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0251-05" xlink:href="note-0251-05a" xml:space="preserve">Marfilius.
                <lb/>
              Aegydins.</note>
            timãtis ſola denominatiua denominãtia, id eſt, vocabula cõnotatiua hoc
              <lb/>
            in loco definita eſſe hoc argumento.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78200" xml:space="preserve"> Denominatiuũ hìc definitum differt
              <lb/>
            caſu à forma denominãte, ſed quemadmodum habere caſus proprium eſt
              <lb/>
            nominum, non rerum, ita in caſibus differre non rebus, ſed nominibus ac-
              <lb/>
            commodandum eſt:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78209" xml:space="preserve"> ergo denominatiuum hic definitum eſt ſolum nomẽ
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0251-06" xlink:href="note-0251-06a" xml:space="preserve">Ammoni
                <lb/>
              Boet.
                <lb/>
              Venet.
                <lb/>
              sotus.</note>
            denominans.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e78216" xml:space="preserve"> Verum ex dictis patet veriorem eſſe ſententiam Ammonij,
              <lb/>
            Boetij Veneti, Soti, & aliorum affirmantium denominatiuum denomina- </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum