Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu. In universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagirita, 1606

List of thumbnails

< >
261
261 (259) 		262
262 (260)
263
263 (261) 		264
264 (262)
265
265 (263) 		266
266 (264)
267
267 (265) 		268
268 (266)
269
269 (267) 		270
270 (268)
< >
page |< < (259) of 990 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="la" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e80137" type="section" level="1" n="120">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81029" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="259" file="0261" n="261" rhead="QVÆSTIOI. ARTICVLVS II."/>
            tradere;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81034" xml:space="preserve"> ſatis ſit indicaſſe illud de identitate cũ accidente;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81037" xml:space="preserve"> quanuis cnim
              <lb/>
            multi accidentales modi cum ſubſtantijs identificentur, non proinde mo
              <lb/>
            dus ſubſtantialis idem eſſe poteſt cum accidente, quia nihil eſt, quod mi-
              <lb/>
            noris entitatis ſit ſecundum ſuam realitatem, quam ſecundum formalita.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81047" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            tem, ſed realitas modi eſt ab ipſo fundamento, ergo ſi modus ſubſtantia-
              <lb/>
            lis in accidente ſit, præſtantior erit, ſecundum formalitatem, quam ſecũ-
              <lb/>
            dum realitatem ſuam, quod in commodum non viſitur, ſi modus acciden-
              <lb/>
            tarius cum ſubſtantia identificentur:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81058" xml:space="preserve"> adde illam vnionem accidentium
              <lb/>
            cum modo ſubſtantiali futuram eſſe hypoſtaticam, quam ferè omnes ne-
              <lb/>
            gant accidenti immediate communicari poſſe.</s>
          </p>
          <note position="right" xml:space="preserve">Ad 2. obie-
            <lb/>
          ctionem.</note>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81083" xml:space="preserve">In qua opinione ad argumentum reſpondendum eſt, vt modus ſit acci-
              <lb/>
            dens non exigere tam formalem, & immediatam dependentiam à ſubie-
              <lb/>
            cto, quantam requirunt perfecta accidentia, ſed ſatis eſſe id habere per
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0261-02" xlink:href="note-0261-02a" xml:space="preserve">Ad exẽplũ
                <lb/>
              de creatio-
                <lb/>
              ne.</note>
            identitatem cum aliquo fundamento, vt re vera habet modus ſubſiſtendi
              <lb/>
            accidentium.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81096" xml:space="preserve"> Ad exemplum de actione creatiua idem reſponderi poteſt
              <lb/>
            ſi ſola accidentia crearentur, aut eorum tantum productio eſſet accidẽ-
              <lb/>
            talis actio, vt quibuſdam videtur.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81117" xml:space="preserve">Verum, quia actio creatiua ſubſtantiæ eſt modus accidentarius, & non
              <lb/>
            identificatur cum vllo accidente, cuius beneficio participet ordinem ad
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0261-03" xlink:href="note-0261-03a" xml:space="preserve">Accidens in
                <lb/>
              communinõ
                <lb/>
              reſpicit eſſẽ-
                <lb/>
              tialiter ſubie
                <lb/>
              ctum inhæ-
                <lb/>
              ſionis.</note>
            ſubiectum, aliter reſpondendum eſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81126" xml:space="preserve"> Credimus ſcilicet accidens in com-
              <lb/>
            muni non depoſcere tranſeendentalem reſpectum ad ſubiectum inhæſio-
              <lb/>
            nis determinatè, ſed ad ſubiectum, vel inhæſionιs, vel prædicationis, ita ta
              <lb/>
            men vt is reſpectus ſit illi eſſentialis, cuiuſmodi eſt ille, quem actio vendi-
              <lb/>
            cat reſpectu principij efficientis, de quo ſolo prædicatur more acciden-
              <lb/>
            tis, & quidem Ariſtotelem tam latè accepiſſe hoc loco eſſe in ſubiecto, ex
              <lb/>
            eo colliges, quia ſub eo complexus eſt prædicamentum habitus, quod in-
              <lb/>
            trinſecè non inhæret, ſed extrinſecus tantum afficiendo denominat.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81144" xml:space="preserve"> Cum
              <lb/>
            verò à Philoſophis vſurpatur eſſentiam accidentis poſitam eſſe in aptitu-
              <lb/>
            dinali inhærentia, quod nos ſtatim proponemus, aut ſumitur vocabulum,
              <lb/>
            inhærentia latè, pro qualibet eſſentiali habitudine ad ſubiectum, aut in-
              <lb/>
            hæſionis realis, aut prædicationis per ſe, vel ratione alterius, aut certè ha
              <lb/>
            betur ratio maioris, & melioris partis accidentium, in qua non eſt actio,
              <lb/>
            neque ille modus ſeparatorum accidentium, & ita intelligenda ſunt, quæ
              <lb/>
            in lib.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81162" xml:space="preserve"> Phyſiolog.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81165" xml:space="preserve"> huιus Curſus de reſpectu eſſentiali accidentis tradũtur.</s>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e81186" type="section" level="1" n="121">
          <head xml:id="echoid-head-d1e81188" xml:space="preserve">ARTICVLVS II.</head>
          <head xml:id="echoid-head-d1e81191" xml:space="preserve" style="it">Vtrum primum diuiſionis membrum rectè explicari ſoleat.</head>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81196" xml:space="preserve">PRIM VM huius diuiſionis membrum eſt ſubſtantia creata com-
              <lb/>
            muniſsimè ſumpta, vt continet completas, & incompletas, eam nõ
              <lb/>
            aliter explicuit Ariſtoteles, quam aſſerendo non eſſe in ſubiecto,
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0261-04" xlink:href="note-0261-04a" xml:space="preserve">Subftantiæ
                <lb/>
              definitio.</note>
            ex quo loco iuncto, cap.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81207" xml:space="preserve"> 8.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81210" xml:space="preserve"> 5.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81213" xml:space="preserve"> lib.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81216" xml:space="preserve"> Metaphyſ.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81220" xml:space="preserve"> hęc tradi ſolet ſubſtan-
              <lb/>
            tiæ definitio.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81225" xml:space="preserve"> Subſtantia eſt ens non exiſtens in alio, quam vt explicemus,
              <lb/>
            afferendæ ſunt in medium præcipuæ huius vocabuli ſignificationes, quæ
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0261-05" xlink:href="note-0261-05a" xml:space="preserve">Significatio
                <lb/>
              nes nomi-
                <lb/>
              nis ſubftan-
                <lb/>
              tia.</note>
            omnino ſunt quatuor.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81234" xml:space="preserve"> Primo accipitur ſubſtãtia pro cuiuſuis rei eſſentia,
              <lb/>
            quo pacto vſurpata fuit in definitionibus Aequiuoci, & Vniuoci, & 5.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81239" xml:space="preserve"> Me-
              <lb/>
            taphyf.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81244" xml:space="preserve"> cap.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81247" xml:space="preserve"> 8.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e81251" xml:space="preserve"> Secundò pro quacunque re, quæ non eſt accidens, ſiue ſit cõ </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum