Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu. In universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagirita, 1606

List of thumbnails

< >
261
261 (259) 		262
262 (260)
263
263 (261) 		264
264 (262)
265
265 (263) 		266
266 (264)
267
267 (265) 		268
268 (266)
269
269 (267) 		270
270 (268)
< >
page |< < (264) of 990 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="la" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e82490" type="section" level="1" n="123">
          <pb o="264" file="0266" n="266" rhead="IN PRÆDIC. ARIST. CAP. DE DECEM PRAEDIC:"/>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82646" xml:space="preserve">Secunda pars eſt loco differentiæ, ſigniſicatque accidens nec eſſe par-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0266-01" xlink:href="note-0266-01a" xml:space="preserve">Exponitur
                <lb/>
              ſecũda pars
                <lb/>
              definiciõis.</note>
            tem ſubiecti, in quo eſt, nec alicuius tertij per ſe conſtituti ex ſubiecto, &
              <lb/>
            tali accidente:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82655" xml:space="preserve"> hęc reijcit primum modum, tertium, quartum, & primam
              <lb/>
            partem quinti, quod per
              <gap/>
            picuum eſt;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82662" xml:space="preserve"> nam pars integrans phyſica, aut me-
              <lb/>
            taphyſica, verè ſunt in toto, vt eius partes, forma verò phyſica ita eſt in
              <lb/>
            materia, vt ex vtraque conſurgat vnum ens per ſe, accidens autem, vt di-
              <lb/>
            ximus ex D.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82671" xml:space="preserve"> Thoma, ſemper eſt in ſubiecto alterius rationis, alioquin ac-
              <lb/>
            cidens non eſſet;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82676" xml:space="preserve"> ex pluribus verò, quæ eiuſdem rationis non ſunt, vnum
              <lb/>
            per ſe fieri non poteſt, quare licet forma non ſit pars materiæ, excluditur
              <lb/>
            tamen per hanc partem, quia eſt quędam pars vnius entis per ſe;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82684" xml:space="preserve"> tertia
              <lb/>
            denique ſignificat id, quod propriè eſt in ſubiecto, non poſſe per vires na-
              <lb/>
            turæ ab eo ita ſeparari, vt perſiſtat, qua excluditur à definitione Octauus
              <lb/>
            modus, & nonus;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82693" xml:space="preserve"> quanuis enim res omnes Vniuerſi à Deo transferrentur
              <lb/>
            inuacuum, vbi nec locus realis eſt, nec tempus, durarent nihilominus ali-
              <lb/>
            quandiu, quemadmodum etiam perſiſterent piſces à flunio extracti.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82700" xml:space="preserve"> Defi-
              <lb/>
            nitio ſic expoſita omni, & ſoli conuenit accidẽti:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82705" xml:space="preserve"> quia hoc ſolùm propriè
              <lb/>
            formaliter, & naturaliter eſt in ſubiecto, cum eoque non coaleſcit in vnũ,
              <lb/>
            & ab illo diuelli non poteſt, aut omnino, vt quod eſt idẽ realiter cum ſub-
              <lb/>
            iecto, videlicet relatio, vbi, & modi ſimiles, aut per ſolam diuinam poten-
              <lb/>
            tiam, vt accidentia ſacræ Euchariſtiæ ſeparantur.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82730" xml:space="preserve">Hæc eſt definitionis expoſitio:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82733" xml:space="preserve"> ſed quid in ea primò definiatur apud
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0266-02" xlink:href="note-0266-02a" xml:space="preserve">Incertũ eſt,
                <lb/>
              quid primo
                <lb/>
              in ea defini
                <lb/>
              atur.</note>
            omnes non conſtat.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82740" xml:space="preserve"> Boetius, Diuus Thomas, Burlæus, & alij non pauci
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0266-03" xlink:href="note-0266-03a" xml:space="preserve">Boetius.</note>
            exiſtimant definitum eſſe accidens:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82747" xml:space="preserve"> Caietanus vero, & alij, accidentis cõ
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0266-04" xlink:href="note-0266-04a" xml:space="preserve">D. Thom.</note>
            ditionem, videlicet eſſe in ſubiecto, quod alij vocant inhærens actu.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82754" xml:space="preserve"> Vt
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0266-05" xlink:href="note-0266-05a" xml:space="preserve">Quatuor in
                <lb/>
              Accidente
                <lb/>
              ſunt diſtin-
                <lb/>
              guenda,
                <lb/>
              Primum.</note>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0266-06" xlink:href="note-0266-06a" xml:space="preserve">Burlęus.</note>
            hæc controuerſia dirimatur, quatuor in accidente diſtinguẽda ſunt:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82764" xml:space="preserve"> pri-
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0266-07" xlink:href="note-0266-07a" xml:space="preserve">Caieta
                <gap/>
              .</note>
            mum, eius natura, & quidditas;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82771" xml:space="preserve"> ſecundum, peculiaris modus, quo deter-
              <lb/>
            minat ens, & veluti quadam differentia diſtinguitnr à ſubſtantia;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82776" xml:space="preserve"> tertiũ,
              <lb/>
            eiuſdem exiſtentia in rerum natura, ſiue hæc ſit modus naturę additus, ſi-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0266-08" xlink:href="note-0266-08a" xml:space="preserve">Secundum.</note>
            ue nihil aliud, quam actualitas accidentis extra ſuas cauſas conſtituti;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82785" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0266-09" xlink:href="note-0266-09a" xml:space="preserve">Tertium.</note>
            quartum, vnio cum ſubiecto, quæ dicitur inhęrentia actualis, & creditur
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0266-10" xlink:href="note-0266-10a" xml:space="preserve">Quartum.</note>
            modus ex natura rei, ab accidentis natura diſtinctus, quando accidens
              <lb/>
            realiter à ſubiecto differt, vbi enim fuerit realis identitas, eiuſmodi vnio
              <lb/>
            neceſſaria non eſt, vt in tertio argumento initio propoſito oſtenſum eſt,
              <lb/>
            in hac vnione fundatur quædam relatio accidentis ad ſubſtantiam, quam
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0266-11" xlink:href="note-0266-11a" xml:space="preserve">Scotus.</note>
            vocant inhærentiam, vt docet Scotus in quarto diſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82807" xml:space="preserve"> 12.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82810" xml:space="preserve"> quæſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82814" xml:space="preserve"> 1.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82817" xml:space="preserve"> & alij, ſed
              <lb/>
            vſus obtinuit, vt ille inhærendi modus, inhęrentia appelletur.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82875" xml:space="preserve">Caietanus igitur, & qui illum ſequuntur, exiſtimant in propoſita defi-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0266-12" xlink:href="note-0266-12a" xml:space="preserve">Opinio Ca
                <lb/>
              ietani, & ali
                <lb/>
              orum reijci
                <lb/>
              tur.</note>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0266-13" xlink:href="note-0266-13a" xml:space="preserve">Caietanus.</note>
            nitione, accidens remotè ſolum, & materialiter explicari, primarium ve
              <lb/>
            rò definitum eſſe inhærentiam in concreto, ſeu ipſum eſſe in ſubiecto, eo-
              <lb/>
            rum fundamentum eſt Ariſtotelem apertè aſſerere ſe definire id, quod
              <lb/>
            eſt in ſubiecto:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82891" xml:space="preserve"> verum ex ijſdem verbis oppoſitum manifeſtè colligitur,
              <lb/>
            nam id, quod eſt in ſubiecto, non eſt ipſum eſſe in ſubiecto, ſed accidens:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82896" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            ſicut id quod exiſtit per ſe, non eſt ipſum exiſtere per ſe, ſed ſubſtantia,
              <lb/>
            quę per ſe exiſtit:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e82903" xml:space="preserve"> deinde Philoſophus ex communi interpretum ſententia
              <lb/>
            diuidit in ſecundo capite ens, in ſubſtantiam, & accidens, ipſumque acci-
              <lb/>
            dens appellat, quod eſt in ſubiecto, ſicut ſubſtantiam vocat, quod non eſt
              <lb/>
            in ſubiecto, & hic definit ſecundum membrum, ergo primo, & per ſe defi-
              <lb/>
            nit accidens.</s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum