Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu. In universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagirita, 1606

List of thumbnails

< >
291
291 (289) 		292
292 (290)
293
293 (291) 		294
294 (292)
295
295 (293) 		296
296 (294)
297
297 (295) 		298
298 (296)
299
299 (297) 		300
300 (298)
< >
page |< < (292) of 990 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="la" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e91270" type="section" level="1" n="132">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92122" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="292" file="0294" n="294" rhead="INCAP. V. DE SVBSTANTIA."/>
            non poteſt Metaphyſica compoſitio, vt proxima quæſtione viſum eſt;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92133" xml:space="preserve"> ex
              <lb/>
            ſingularitate quoque diuinę naturæ, euidens ſumitur argumentum, nam
              <lb/>
            omne ſingulare vniuocè contentum ſub aliquo communi habere poteſt
              <lb/>
            alia ſimilia in natura, at poſsibiles eſſe plures Deos naturæ lumen refra-
              <lb/>
            gatur.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92178" xml:space="preserve">Ad locum Ariſtotelis pro ſecunda ſententia propoſitum reſponderi
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0294-01" xlink:href="note-0294-01a" xml:space="preserve">Explicatur
                <lb/>
              Ariltoteles
                <lb/>
              pro 2. ſent.
                <lb/>
              adductus.</note>
            poteſt, primo nomine generis intelligi ſpeciem, argumentatur enim Phi-
              <lb/>
            loſophus contra Platonem, atque vt illius ideas euertat, ſic ratiocinatur.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92187" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            Contraria differunt ſpecie, ſed corruptibile, & incorruptibile ſunt con-
              <lb/>
            traria;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92194" xml:space="preserve"> ergo differunt genere;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92197" xml:space="preserve"> ergo homines ſingulares non poſſunt eſſe
              <lb/>
            eiuſdem ſpeciei cum ipſorum idea, cum hæc ſit incorruptibilis, illi cor-
              <lb/>
            ruptioni ſuccumbant, vbi neſit cauillum in argumento, per genus ſpeciẽ
              <lb/>
            intelligit:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92206" xml:space="preserve"> verum quia ſubdit magis diſtare ea, quę differunt genere, quam
              <lb/>
            quę ſpecie, Diuus Thomas eodem loco, Alenſis, & aliquot interpretes no
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0294-02" xlink:href="note-0294-02a" xml:space="preserve">D. Thom.
                <lb/>
              Alenſ.</note>
            mine generis non intelligunt genus prædicabile, ſed genus ſubiectum, ſeu
              <lb/>
            phyſicum, hoc eſt, materiam primam, penes quam neceſſe eſt corruptibi-
              <lb/>
            le, & incorruptibile differant:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92220" xml:space="preserve"> ſigniſicari autem ab Ariſtotele nomine ge-
              <lb/>
            neris materiam primam, & conſtat ex primo poſteriorum text.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92225" xml:space="preserve"> 19.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92228" xml:space="preserve"> & 4.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92231" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            Metaphyſ.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92236" xml:space="preserve"> text.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92239" xml:space="preserve"> 2.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92243" xml:space="preserve"> & lib.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92246" xml:space="preserve"> 5.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92249" xml:space="preserve"> text.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92252" xml:space="preserve"> 33.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92255" xml:space="preserve"> & deprehenditur ex eodem loco, neque
              <lb/>
            enim concludit corruptibile differre genere ex eo ſolum, quòd ſint con-
              <lb/>
            traria, ſed quia alterum includit potentiam ſubiectam priuationi, alterũ
              <lb/>
            non, cum autem ſubiectum priuationis ſit materia, recte infert, quæ ſecũ-
              <lb/>
            dùm potentiam ad priuationem diſcrepant, ſubiecto diſtingui.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92266" xml:space="preserve"> Quare nul
              <lb/>
            lo modo negat corruptibile, & incorruptibile in eodem prædicamento
              <lb/>
            collocari.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92293" xml:space="preserve">Ad argumenta pro tertia opinione reſpondemus imprimis Ariſtotelẽ
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0294-03" xlink:href="note-0294-03a" xml:space="preserve">Diluuntur
                <lb/>
              argumenta
                <lb/>
              3. ſentent.</note>
            ſolum excludere ab intelligentijs potentialitatem materiæ primæ, non
              <lb/>
            autem generis, quæ eſt communior interpretum expoſitio:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92302" xml:space="preserve"> vnde ad pri-
              <lb/>
            mam rationem, quæ eodem loco nitebatur, negandum eſt intelligentiam
              <lb/>
            ita abhorrere à potentia, vt nullam admittat compoſitionem:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92309" xml:space="preserve"> ad confir-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0294-04" xlink:href="note-0294-04a" xml:space="preserve">Ad 1. argu.
                <lb/>
              reſponſio.</note>
            mationem dices D.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92316" xml:space="preserve"> Thomam voluiſſe exprimere ſimilitudinem inuentam
              <lb/>
            inter genus, & materiam ex vna parte, & ſormam ac differentiam ex alia,
              <lb/>
            non verò genus re vera ſumi ex ſola materia, & differentiam ex ſola for-
              <lb/>
            ma, eſt enim id perſpicuè falſum, cum vltima ſaltem differentia cuiuſlibet
              <lb/>
            ſingularis æqualiter ſumatur ex materia, & forma, nõ minus enim differt
              <lb/>
            materia Socratis à materia Platonis, quã vnius anima ab anima alterius,
              <lb/>
            ergo ab vtraque deſumi poteſt, & debet differentia, vt perfecta ſit:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92332" xml:space="preserve"> animal
              <lb/>
            etiam cum includat animam ſenſitiuam, & multarum operationum prin-
              <lb/>
            cipium ſit, ex ſola materia deriuari non poteſt.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92358" xml:space="preserve">Ad ſecundam negatur antecedens, ad illius probationem concedendũ
              <lb/>
            eſt nullas alias partes phyſicas eſſe in corpore pręter materiam, & formã
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0294-05" xlink:href="note-0294-05a" xml:space="preserve">Reſponſio
                <lb/>
              ad 2. arg.</note>
            in illis tamen inueniri ab intellectu ſundamentũ conuenientiæ inter cor-
              <lb/>
            pus, & ſpiritum, in eo quod vtrunque ſubſiſtat;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92369" xml:space="preserve"> & differentiæ, quatenus
              <lb/>
            vnum eſt compoſitum, & corporeum, aliud phyſicè ſimplex, & incorporeũ
              <lb/>
            & in illo conſtituimus rationem ſubſtantiæ generis ſumi, in hoc rationem
              <lb/>
            differentiæ, neque enim nos in eã ſententiã inclinamus, quæ actualem di-
              <lb/>
            ſtinctionem inter hos gradus agnoſcit, & ab hoc argumento nunquam ſe
              <lb/>
            expedit, vt in Metaphy ſica patebit.</s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum