Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu. In universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagirita, 1606

List of thumbnails

< >
291
291 (289) 		292
292 (290)
293
293 (291) 		294
294 (292)
295
295 (293) 		296
296 (294)
297
297 (295) 		298
298 (296)
299
299 (297) 		300
300 (298)
< >
page |< < (293) of 990 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="la" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e91270" type="section" level="1" n="132">
          <pb o="293" file="0295" n="295" rhead="QVAESTIO II. ARTICVLVS I."/>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92395" xml:space="preserve">Ad tertiam diſtinguenda eſt maior propoſitio, aut enim per componi
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0295-01" xlink:href="note-0295-01a" xml:space="preserve">Reſponſie
                <lb/>
              ad 3. arg.</note>
            eſſentialiter ex partibus, intelligit incluſionem earundem partium, ita vt
              <lb/>
            eſſentialiter componi non dicatur, niſi id, quod partes in eſſentia inciu-
              <lb/>
            dit, vel intelligit compoſitionem, aut per incluſionem, aut per identitatẽ;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92406" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            in priori ſenſu conceſſa maiori, neganda eſt minor, neque enim ſubſtãtia
              <lb/>
            in corpore ita componitur ex materia, & forma, vt eas in ſua ratione in-
              <lb/>
            cludat, licet recte dicatur ex illis ſecundum eſſentiam componi, quatenus
              <lb/>
            actu eſt idem cum corpore, quod eſſentialiter ex eiſdem conſtat, eaſque
              <lb/>
            includit:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92419" xml:space="preserve"> in poſteriori ſenſu neganda eſt maior, nam idem gradus per di-
              <lb/>
            uerſas ſui partes identitatem habere poteſt cum corpore, & cum ſpiritu,
              <lb/>
            & in vno re ipſa compoſitus eſſe, in alio ſimplex exiſtere.</s>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e92436" type="section" level="1" n="133">
          <head xml:id="echoid-head-d1e92438" xml:space="preserve" style="it">QVÆSTIO SECVNDA.</head>
          <head xml:id="echoid-head-d1e92441" xml:space="preserve" style="it">Vtrum ſubſtantia rectè diuidatur ab Ariſtotele in primam, & ſecundam.</head>
          <head xml:id="echoid-head-d1e92444" xml:space="preserve">ARTICVLVS I.</head>
          <head xml:id="echoid-head-d1e92447" xml:space="preserve" style="it">Aliorum de propoſita diuiſione ſententiæ improbanter.</head>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92452" xml:space="preserve">VIX enumeres, quot prolatæ ſunt in re tam leui ſententiæ, quinq́;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92455" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0295-02" xlink:href="note-0295-02a" xml:space="preserve">Celebrio-
                <lb/>
              res hac de
                <lb/>
              re opiniões
                <lb/>
              Prima.</note>
            celebriores exiſtunt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92462" xml:space="preserve"> Prima eſt Ammonij ad hunc locum negãtis
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0295-03" xlink:href="note-0295-03a" xml:space="preserve">A
                <gap/>
              mon.</note>
            vllam fieri in præſenti diuiſionem, ſed quandam enumerationem
              <lb/>
            eorũ, quę ſunt in prædicamẽto ſubſtantiæ, quaſi ita numeret Phi
              <lb/>
            loſophus ſubſtãtias in prędicamẽto exiſtentes, vt quis recẽſere ſolet gym
              <lb/>
            naſij auditores.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92475" xml:space="preserve"> Ad hanc ſententiã adduci potuit hic autor, & qui eum ſe-
              <lb/>
            quũtur ea ratione, quod ſuperiùs, & inferiùs conuenire non poſsint in ali
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0295-04" xlink:href="note-0295-04a" xml:space="preserve">2. opinionis
                <lb/>
              fundamen-
                <lb/>
              tum.</note>
            quo tertio, quod in ipſis diuidatur, nam ſuperius continetur in eſſentia in
              <lb/>
            ferioris, ergo ſiquid eſſet, in quo ambo conuenirent, illud bis eſſet in infe-
              <lb/>
            riori, ſemel ratione ipſius inferioris, & iterum ratione communis in eo in
              <lb/>
            cluſi, itemque ſuperius ſemel atque iterum in tertio conueniret, videli-
              <lb/>
            cet ratione ſui, & ratione inferioris, in quo eſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92493" xml:space="preserve"> Secunda ſentẽtia extremè
              <lb/>
            contraria eſt diuiſionem eſſe vniuocam.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92499" xml:space="preserve"> Defenditur à Tartareto hoc ca-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0295-05" xlink:href="note-0295-05a" xml:space="preserve">Tartaretus.</note>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0295-06" xlink:href="note-0295-06a" xml:space="preserve">2. Opinio.</note>
            pite, & probatur, quia membra diuidentia ſunt ſecundę intentiones, ſcili-
              <lb/>
            cet relationes ſubſtantiæ prędicamentalis, ſed hæ æqualiter participãt
              <lb/>
            relationem cõmunẽ ſubſtãtiæ prædicamentalis, ergo diuiſio eſt vniuoca.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92546" xml:space="preserve">Tertia ſententia Soti, & Burlæi hoc loco aſſerit diuiſionem eſſe ſubie-
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0295-07" xlink:href="note-0295-07a" xml:space="preserve">3. Opinio.</note>
            cti in accidentia rationis;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92553" xml:space="preserve"> idem quippè eſt ſubſtantiam diuidi in primam
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0295-08" xlink:href="note-0295-08a" xml:space="preserve">Sotus.
                <lb/>
              Burlæus.</note>
            & ſecundam, atque in ſubiectum, & prædicatum, credunt nimirum primã
              <lb/>
            ſubſtantiam ſigniſicare ſubiectum, & ſecundam prędicatum, quod ſuade-
              <lb/>
            re videntur earum definitiones à Philoſopho ſubiectæ, prima enim deſi-
              <lb/>
            nitur, quæ non eſt in alio, nec de illo prędicatur, quæ ſunt conditiones ſub
              <lb/>
            iecti, ſecunda verò id, ſub quo eſt prima, id eſt prędicatũ reſpectu primę.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e92569" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            Huic affinis eſt opinio Louanienſium exiſtimantium diuidi ſubſtantiam
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0295-09" xlink:href="note-0295-09a" xml:space="preserve">Louanien-
                <lb/>
              ſium ſenten
                <lb/>
              tia.</note>
            in vniuerſalem, & particularem, quatenus hę etiam dicunt ſecũdas inten-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0295-10" xlink:href="note-0295-10a" xml:space="preserve">Louanienſ.</note>
            tiones, aliquantulum tamen variant in forma diuiſionis, quia iudicant eſ-
              <lb/>
            ſe accidentis in accidentia, videlicet quia diuiditur ſubſtantia prędica-
              <lb/>
            mentalis in primam, & ſecundam.</s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum