Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu. In universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagirita, 1606

List of thumbnails

< >
311
311 (309)
312
312 (310)
313
313 (311)
314
314 (312)
315
315 (313)
316
316 (314)
317
317 (315)
318
318 (316)
319
319 (317)
320
320 (318)
< >
page |< < (312) of 990 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="la" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div-d1e98160" type="section" level="1" n="140">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98434" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="312" file="0314" n="314" rhead="IN CAP. VI. DE QVANTITATE."/>
            ordinantur inter ſe, vt præter quam quod ſint plures, ita affectæ exiſtant,
              <lb/>
            vt ſeruent inter ſe ordinem, quo v.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98444" xml:space="preserve"> c.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98447" xml:space="preserve"> primo loco ſit caput, deinde collum,
              <lb/>
            tertiò pectus, & cętera.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98452" xml:space="preserve"> Tertia eſt extenſio aptitudinalis in ordine ad lo-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0314-01" xlink:href="note-0314-01a" xml:space="preserve">3. in ordine
                <lb/>
              ad locũ apti
                <lb/>
              tudinalis.</note>
            cum, qua ſcilicet duę partes eiuſdem corporis, aut duo corpora ita ſe ex-
              <lb/>
            cludunt, vt neceſſario vendicent diuerſas partes loci, quod cernitur in
              <lb/>
            cuiuſlibet corporis partibus, alteri enim loco reſpondet caput, alteri pe-
              <lb/>
            des, & c.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98465" xml:space="preserve"> Quarta eſt actualis extenſio in eodẽ loco, quæ correſponder prę-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0314-02" xlink:href="note-0314-02a" xml:space="preserve">4 in ordine
                <lb/>
              ad locũ ac-
                <lb/>
              tualis.</note>
            dictæ aptitudini, eſtque proprius illius actus;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98472" xml:space="preserve"> porro has duas extenſiones
              <lb/>
            eſſe diuerſas (de cæteris enim conſpicuum eſt) deprehenditur in corpore
              <lb/>
            Chriſti in Sacramento altaris exiſtente, quod aptum cum ſit ratione quã
              <lb/>
            titatis locum diuiſibilem occupare, ab eoq́ue omne aliud corpus exclude
              <lb/>
            re, actn
              <unsure/>
            neutrum habet, ſiquidem omnes partes corporis eidem puncto
              <lb/>
            reſpondent, & in eodem ſpatio cum quantitate hoſtię perſiſtunt.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98527" xml:space="preserve">Cum igitur tertia ſententia aſſerit rationem quantitatis eſſe extenſio-
              <lb/>
            nem, & primarium illius effectum reddere corpus extenſum, nõ intelligit
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0314-03" xlink:href="note-0314-03a" xml:space="preserve">Capreol.</note>
            primam, vel quartam extenſionem, licet Capreol.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98536" xml:space="preserve"> loco citato exiſtimaue
              <lb/>
            rit ſubſtantiam materialem nullas ante quantitatem partes habere, ſed
              <lb/>
            eius beneficio illas accipere, ita vt ſi materia corporis humani ſine quã-
              <lb/>
            titate à Deo conſeruaretur, nullis conſtaret partibus ſubſtantialibus, ijs
              <lb/>
            tamen potiretur, ſi rurſum quantitatem indueret;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98547" xml:space="preserve"> ſed fieri non poſſe, vt
              <lb/>
            ſubſtantia recipiat à quantitate einſmodi partes, atque adeo primam ex
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0314-04" xlink:href="note-0314-04a" xml:space="preserve">Entitatiuã
                <lb/>
              extenſio nẽ
                <lb/>
              àquantitate
                <lb/>
              non eſſe.</note>
            tenſionem, ſuadetur primo.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98556" xml:space="preserve"> Partes ſubſtantiæ corporeę ſunt ſubſtantiales
              <lb/>
            ergo nequeunt ab accidente, cuiuſmodi eſt quantitas, formaliter proue-
              <lb/>
            nire, eſt enim hoc commune omnibus accidentibus, vt ſubiectis, in quibus
              <lb/>
            ſunt, ſe ipſa tantum communicent, cum igitur quantitas ſubſtantiales par
              <lb/>
            tes non habeat, quì fieri poteſt, vt ſe communicando illas impendat?</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98567" xml:space="preserve"> Secũ
              <lb/>
            do, entitas ſub ſtantię corporeę ante quantitatem eſt, vt nullus inficiatur,
              <lb/>
            ſed non eſt ſimplex;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98575" xml:space="preserve"> ergo ante quantitatem habet partes, ex quibus com-
              <lb/>
            ponatur;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98580" xml:space="preserve"> minor oſtenditur, quia accidens non mutat eſſe ſubſtantiale ſub
              <lb/>
            iecti, cui aduenit, ſed illud in ſe perfectum ſupponit;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98585" xml:space="preserve"> ergo non efficeret
              <lb/>
            quantitas, vt ſubſtantia corporis ſit ſubſtantialiter cõpoſita, ſi prius ſim-
              <lb/>
            plex extitiſſet.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98592" xml:space="preserve"> Tertio è contrario, ſi ſubſtantia, quandiu erat ſub quanti-
              <lb/>
            tate, habebat partes diſtinctas, vt cõcedunt;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98597" xml:space="preserve"> ergo cum à Deo conſeruatur
              <lb/>
            ſine quantitate, eaſdem retinebit, alioquin non ſeruabitur eadem ſubſtã-
              <lb/>
            tia, ſed prius eſſet ſubſtantia compoſita, poſteà alia ſimplex;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98604" xml:space="preserve"> ergo primus
              <lb/>
            effectus quantitatis non eſt extenſio entitatiua, ſeu ſubſtantialis.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98610" xml:space="preserve"> Deinde
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0314-05" xlink:href="note-0314-05a" xml:space="preserve">Nec localẽ
                <lb/>
              actualẽ eſſe
                <lb/>
              primũ eius
                <lb/>
              effectum.</note>
            non eſſe localem actualem, quæ erat quarta extenſio, non eget alia pro-
              <lb/>
            batione, quam exiſtentia corporis Chriſti in Sacramento.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98619" xml:space="preserve"> vbi certum eſt
              <lb/>
            eſſe quantitatem in corpore inhærentem, & nihilominus illud non conſti-
              <lb/>
            tuere actu extenſum in loco, nec aliud corpus excludere.</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98653" xml:space="preserve">Superſunt ſecũda, & tertia extenſio, de quibus eſt tota huius dubitatio-
              <lb/>
            nis contentio.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98658" xml:space="preserve"> Et quod ad antiquorum philoſophorum mentem attinet,
              <lb/>
            nihil certum deprehendi poteſt, quanuis maior eorum pars explicare ſo-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0314-06" xlink:href="note-0314-06a" xml:space="preserve">Extenſionẽ
                <lb/>
              totius eſſe
                <lb/>
              primũ quã-
                <lb/>
              titatis eſſe-
                <lb/>
              ctum aliqui
                <lb/>
              opinantur.</note>
            leat quantitatem in ordinem ad locum;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98667" xml:space="preserve"> quod tamen indicium haud mag-
              <lb/>
            nam facit coniecturam, poſſunt enim explicare quantitatem per effectum
              <lb/>
            notiorem, qualis eſt localis extenſio, eſto alia ſit prior.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98674" xml:space="preserve"> Nonnulli igitur vo
              <lb/>
            lunt ſecundam extenſionem ſubſtantię eſſe primarium eſſectum quanti-
              <lb/>
            tatis;</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98681" xml:space="preserve"> quod explicando ſic primo confirmare poſſunt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s-d1e98685" xml:space="preserve"> Effectus primarius
              <lb/>
            quanti- </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>