Agricola, Georgius, De re metallica, 1912/1950

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
< >
page |< < of 679 > >|
1alone, did not free themselves utterly from avarice, because although he is not
enjoying them, one who can possess other forms of property may also
become avaricious.
Now let us reply to the attacks hurled against the products of mines.
In the first place, they call gold and silver the scourge of mankind because
they are the cause of destruction and ruin to their possessors.
But in this
manner, might not anything that we possess be called a scourge to
human kind,—whether it be a horse, or a garment, or anything else?
For, whether one rides a splendid horse, or journeys well clad, he would
give occasion to a robber to kill him.
Are we then not to ride on horses,
but to journey on foot, because a robber has once committed a murder in
order that he may steal a horse?
Or are we not to possess clothing, because
a vagabond with a sword has taken a traveller's life that he may rob him
of his garment?
The possession of gold and silver is similar. Seeing
then that men cannot conveniently do all these things, we should be on our
guard against robbers, and because we cannot always protect ourselves
from their hands, it is the special duty of the magistrate to seize wicked and
villainous men for torture, and, if need be, for execution.
Again, the products of the mines are not themselves the cause of war.
Thus, for example, when a tyrant, inflamed with passion for a woman of
great beauty, makes war on the inhabitants of her city, the fault lies in the
unbridled lust of the tyrant and not in the beauty of the woman.
Likewise,
when another man, blinded by a passion for gold and silver, makes war
upon a wealthy people, we ought not to blame the metals but transfer all
blame to avarice.
For frenzied deeds and disgraceful actions, which are
wont to weaken and dishonour natural and civil laws, originate from our
own vices.
Wherefore Tibullus is wrong in laying the blame for war on
gold, when he says: “This is the fault of a rich man's gold; there were
no wars when beech goblets were used at banquets.” But Virgil, speaking of
Polymnestor, says that the crime of the murderer rests on avarice:
“He breaks all law; he murders Polydorus, and obtains gold by
violence.
To what wilt thou not drive mortal hearts, thou accursed
hunger for gold?”
And again, justly, he says, speaking of Pygmalion, who killed Sichaeus:
“And blinded with the love of gold, he slew him unawares with
stealthy sword.”22
For lust and eagerness after gold and other things make men blind, and
this wicked greed for money, all men in all times and places have considered
dishonourable and criminal.
Moreover, those who have been so addicted to
avarice as to be its slaves have always been regarded as mean and sordid.
Similarly, too, if by means of gold and silver and gems men can overcome
the chastity of women, corrupt the honour of many people, bribe the course
of justice and commit innumerable wickednesses, it is not the metals which
are to be blamed, but the evil passions of men which become inflamed and
ignited; or it is due to the blind and impious desires of their minds.
But

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index