Archimedes
,
Natation of bodies
,
1662
Text
Text Image
XML
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 68
>
Scan
Original
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 68
>
page
|<
<
of 68
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
073/01/037.jpg
"
pagenum
="
367
"/>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1228
"/>
(a)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By 4. of the
<
lb
/>
ſixth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1229
"/>
* Or permitting.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1230
"/>
(b)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By 22. of the
<
lb
/>
ſixth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1231
"/>
(c)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Cor.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
of 20.
<
lb
/>
of the ſixth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
head
">
<
s
>LEMMA IV.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>The ſame things aſſumed again, and M Q being drawn from the
<
lb
/>
Point M unto the Diameter, let it touch the Section in the
<
lb
/>
Point M. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſay that H Q hath to Q O, the ſame proportion
<
lb
/>
that G H hath to C N.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
For make H R equall to G F; and ſeeing that
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.073.01.037.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
073/01/037/1.jpg
"
number
="
34
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
the Triangles A F C and O P N are alike, and
<
lb
/>
P N equall to F C, we might in like manner de
<
lb
/>
monſtrate P O and F A to be equall to each other:
<
lb
/>
Wherefore P O ſhall be double to F B: But H O
<
lb
/>
is double to G B: Therefore the Remainder P H
<
lb
/>
is alſo double to the Remainder F G; that is, to
<
lb
/>
R H: And therefore is followeth that P R, R H
<
lb
/>
and F G are equall to one another; as alſo that
<
lb
/>
R G and P F are equall: For P G is common to
<
lb
/>
both R P and G F. </
s
>
<
s
>Since therefore, that H B is
<
lb
/>
to B G, as G B is to B F, by Converſion of Pro
<
lb
/>
portion, B H ſhall be to H G, as B G is to G F:
<
lb
/>
But Q H is to H B, as H O to B G. </
s
>
<
s
>For by 35
<
lb
/>
of our firſt Book of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Conicks,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in regard that Q
<
lb
/>
M toucheth the Section in the Point M, H B and
<
lb
/>
B Q ſhall be equall, and Q H double to H B:
<
lb
/>
Therefore,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ex æquali,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Q H ſhall be to H G, as
<
lb
/>
H O to G F; that is, to H R: and,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Permu
<
lb
/>
tando,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Q H ſhall be to H O, as H G to H R: again, by Converſion, H Q ſhall be to Q
<
lb
/>
O, as H G to G R; that is, to P F; and, by the ſame reaſon, to C N: Whichwas to be de
<
lb
/>
monſtrated.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Theſe things therefore being explained, we come now to that
<
lb
/>
which was propounded. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſay, therefore, firſt that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
N C
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
hath
<
lb
/>
to C K the ſame proportion that H G hath to G B.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
For ſince that H Q is to Q O, as H G to C N
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
;
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.073.01.037.2.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
073/01/037/2.jpg
"
number
="
35
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
that is, to A O, equall to the ſaid C N: The Re
<
lb
/>
mainder G Q ſhall be to the Remainder Q A, as
<
lb
/>
H Q to Q O: and, for the ſame cauſe, the Lines
<
lb
/>
A C and G L prolonged, by the things that wee
<
lb
/>
have above demonstrated, ſhall interſect or meet
<
lb
/>
in the Line Q M. Again, G Q is to Q A,
<
lb
/>
as H Q to Q O: that is, as H G to F P; as
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1232
"/>
<
lb
/>
(a)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
was bnt now demonstrated, But unto
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(b)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
G
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1233
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Q two Lines taken together, Q B that is H B, and
<
lb
/>
B G are equall: and to Q A H F is equall; for
<
lb
/>
if from the equall Magnitudes H B and B Q there
<
lb
/>
be taken the equall Magnitudes F B and B A, the
<
lb
/>
Re mainder ſhall be equall; Therefore taking H
<
lb
/>
G from the two Lines H B and B G, there ſhall re
<
lb
/>
main a Magnitude double to B G; that is, O H:
<
lb
/>
and P F taken from F H, the Remainder is H P:
<
lb
/>
Wherefore
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(c)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
O H is to H P, as G Q to Q A:
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1234
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
But as G Q is to Q A, ſo is H Q to Q O;
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>