Fabri, Honoré, Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur, 1665

Table of figures

< >
< >
page |< < of 248 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <pb pagenum="159" xlink:href="025/01/163.jpg"/>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001813">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001814"> Minimè verò, & alia ratio eſt congreſſus guttarum & cono­
                <lb/>
              rum flammæ, de qua infra. </s>
              <s id="s.001815">Primò, enim gratis affingitur prædicta vis
                <lb/>
              adhæſiva liquidis corporibus, ex iis ſcilicet effectibus, qui aliis cauſis tri­
                <lb/>
              buendi ſunt. </s>
              <s id="s.001816">Secundò, etiamſi canaliculus ante non maduerit, aqua
                <lb/>
              tamen aſſurgit, ſi paulò laxior eſt; centies probavi infuſo in ampullam
                <lb/>
                <figure id="id.025.01.163.1.jpg" xlink:href="025/01/163/1.jpg" number="55"/>
                <lb/>
              A oleo; & ne quiſpiam diceret, oleum aſſurgere
                <lb/>
              per GF, propter impetum infuſionis, infudi
                <lb/>
              oleum, inclinata versùs B ampulla; ita vt ſuper­
                <lb/>
              ficies olei per canaliculum vix aſſurgeretin H ;
                <lb/>
              tum deinde erecta ampulla, oleum aſcendit in F,
                <lb/>
              licèt inferior canaliculi ſuperficies ſicca omnino
                <lb/>
              eſſet; idem fiet admoto canaliculo ſuperficiei
                <lb/>
              olei, ſi paulo major ſit. </s>
              <s id="s.001817">Tertiò, Non video cur
                <lb/>
              major aquæ portio minorem potiùs ad ſe non adducat, quàm minor ma­
                <lb/>
              jorem; ſi enim prædicta vi vtraque pollet, major certè majore, ſcilicet
                <lb/>
              extenſivè, vt major flamma magis calefacit, quàm minor; accedit, quod
                <lb/>
              in hoc caſu, minor longè faciliùs ad majorem accederet, ſcilicet deſcen­
                <lb/>
              dendo, quàm major ad minorem aſcendendo. </s>
              <s id="s.001818">Quartò, in majore tubo
                <lb/>
              madefacto eadem ratio militaret; nec dicas obſtare majorem vim pon­
                <lb/>
              deris; quia cùm vis illa adhæſiva omnibus partibus aquæ inſit, eadem eſt
                <lb/>
              illius proportio ad reſiſtentiam ponderis in majore, quæ in minore; &
                <lb/>
              vt duæ partes in minore ſuperant duas partes ponderis; ita mille partes in
                <lb/>
              majore ſuperabunt mille partes ponderis. </s>
              <s id="s.001819">Quintò, Cur oleum altiùs aſ­
                <lb/>
              ſurgit, quàm aqua? </s>
              <s id="s.001820">Cur Mercurius ferè nihil? </s>
              <s id="s.001821">dico ferè, quia infra evin­
                <lb/>
              cam tantulùm aſſurgere; Cur aliquando ipſa aqua altiùs, aliàs minùs
                <lb/>
              altè aſcendit? </s>
              <s id="s.001822">Nihil horum cum illa vi adhæſiva ſtare poteſt. </s>
              <s id="s.001823">Sextò,
                <lb/>
              Cur aqua per canaliculum inclinatum longiùs excurrit? </s>
              <s id="s.001824">Cur per bre­
                <lb/>
              viorem, quamvis madefactum interiùs, minùs altè, & ſi adhuc breviorem
                <lb/>
              accipias, ferè nihil aſſurgit? </s>
              <s id="s.001825">Cur per tubulos alioquin ſicciſſimæ materiæ,
                <lb/>
              vt panis bis cocti, panni, telæ &c. </s>
              <s id="s.001826">Ex his vides, ni fallor, Chryſocome, aliam
                <lb/>
              omnino hujus effectus cauſam quærendam eſſe. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001827">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001828"> Sed cur per canaliculum ſiccum non aſſurgit, atque adeò ca­
                <lb/>
              va illius ſuperficies humectanda eſt? </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001829">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001830"> Si canaliculus paulò laxior ſit, & majoris baſis etiam per ſic­
                <lb/>
              cum aſcendit; non aſcendit, tamen ſi anguſtiſſimus ſit, niſi ſen ſim ac
                <lb/>
              lentè; quia licèt ſuperficies vitri lævigata eſſe videatur, mille tamen
                <lb/>
              ſalebris & rugis, ſeu ſtriis aſperatur, quæ niſi affuſo humore com­
                <lb/>
              planentur, aſperum iter faciunt, & modicam aquæ portionem faci­
                <lb/>
              lè ſiſtunt; cùm tamen in majore canaliculo non obſtent; quin major
                <lb/>
              aquæ copia aſſurgat; accedit, quod ſi juxta Figuras præcedentes vaſa
                <lb/>
              conformentur, aqua etiam per canaliculum ſiccum aſcendit; cur au­
                <lb/>
              tem aquæ gutta intra aliam ſubeat, vel flamma intra flammam, dicemus
                <lb/>
              poſtea. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001831">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001832"> Ex his ergo conſtat, totam rem iſtam ab aëris com­
                <lb/>
              preſſione petendam eſſe, vt jam indicaſti in ſuperiore congreſſu, </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum