Fabri, Honoré, Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur, 1665

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 81]
[Figure 82]
[Figure 83]
< >
page |< < of 248 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000916">
                <pb pagenum="81" xlink:href="025/01/085.jpg"/>
              tuatur in QL ducaturque ML ſecans PN in D, haud dubiè erit PO, ad
                <lb/>
              QL, vel PN, vt MP ad MQ, id eſt vt 1. ad 6.
                <gap/>
              ſed angulus LML, vel
                <lb/>
              OMP eſt ad angulum NMP, vt PO, ad PN, nempe in acutiſſimis angu­
                <lb/>
              lis, qualis ſupponitur is, ſub quo videtur Veneris diameter, arcus ſunt
                <lb/>
              ad ſenſum vt tangentes; igitur angulus OMP eſt ad angulum NMP vt
                <lb/>
              1. ad 6.
                <gap/>
              cùm igitur Veneris diſtantia minima ſit ad maximam, vt vnum ad
                <lb/>
              6.
                <gap/>
              ejus diameter apparens in minima eſt ad apparentum in maxima vt
                <lb/>
              NP ad PO, id eſt vt 6.
                <gap/>
              paulò plus ad
                <gap/>
              igitur diſcus Veneris perigeæ
                <lb/>
              appatens eſt ad diſcum apogeæ vt 40.
                <gap/>
              ad 1. & re ipſa talem eſſe Coperni­
                <lb/>
              canæ ſententiæ defenſores pronunciant. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000917">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Chryſoc.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000918"> Cur appellas Copernicanæ ſententiæ defenſores? </s>
              <s id="s.000919">alios etiam
                <lb/>
              appellare debueras, cùm etiam ex Tychonico ſyſtemate eadem prorſus
                <lb/>
              diametrorum apparentium ratio, ſeu proportio conſequatur. </s>
            </p>
            <figure id="id.025.01.085.1.jpg" xlink:href="025/01/085/1.jpg" number="28"/>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000920">Fac enim terram eſſe immobilem in B, Solemque per orbem ANML
                <lb/>
              ire, ac ſecum deferte centrum epicycli Veneris; hauddubie Venus erit
                <lb/>
              perigæa in K, apogæa in H. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000921">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000922"> Hoc ipſum in primo noſtro congreſſu à quo aberas, Chryſoco­
                <lb/>
              me, indicatum à me ſuperat, vt videte eſt, in V.figura, & ideò non circularem
                <lb/>
              epicyclum deſcripſi nec etiam ellipticum, ſed ſpital: quadam, ſeu quaſi pa­
                <lb/>
              rabolica linea terminatum ab apogæo ad maximam digreſſionem, & hinc
                <lb/>
              ad perigæum alia curva ad rectam proxime accedente: porrò noſtro </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>