Fabri, Honoré, Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur, 1665

List of thumbnails

< >
61
61 		62
62
63
63 		64
64
65
65 		66
66
67
67 		68
68
69
69 		70
70
< >
page |< < of 248 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000673">
                <pb pagenum="60" xlink:href="025/01/064.jpg"/>
              ſiſtere nequit, quantumvis contranitatur, ſcilicet propter impreſſum ante
                <lb/>
              impetum; in vibratis libratiſque corporibus innumera ferè ſuppetunt
                <lb/>
              exempla. </s>
              <s id="s.000674">Quid mirum igitur, ſi prædictus maris tractus impetum ante
                <lb/>
              impreſſum retineat & excurrat in Ortum; neque hoc impedit connexio
                <lb/>
              partium ejuſdem globi, niſi hæ ſolidæ ſint ac duræ, nec non ita inter ſe
                <lb/>
              connexæ, vt vna ab alia ſeparari non poſſit; tunc enim moventur iuxta
                <lb/>
              leges novi impetus deſtructò priore; nec mirum, cùm fruſtra ſit; fruſtra au­
                <lb/>
              tem eſt, quia motum alium habere 1. on poteſt, præter illum, quem novus
                <lb/>
              impetus exigit. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000675">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Chryſoc.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000676"> Si ergo in puncto E eſſet corpus ſolidum & durum, totum
                <lb/>
              priorem impetum a mitteret accedente novo. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000677">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000678"> Minimè verò, niſi arctè cum aliis corporibus duris connexum
                <lb/>
              eſſet, ſit enim v.g.globus lævigatiſſimus in E, ſupra ſuperficiem ſolidam
                <lb/>
              etiam lævigatiſſimam, vitream puta, haud dubiè curreret prædictus glo­
                <lb/>
              bus versùs Ortum, præſertim cùm ad hunc motum nullo aſcenſu opus ſit,
                <lb/>
              ac proinde nulla prorſus inclinatio contraria obſtet. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000679">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Chryſocom.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000680"> Igitur ille globus ita ſemper moveretur in ſuperficie tetræ;
                <lb/>
              nihil enim deſtrueret illum impetum; quod
                <gap/>
              modò ex tuis principiis
                <lb/>
              deduco, ſed ex trito Mathematicorum dicto. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000681">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000682"> Hoc certè ex meis principiis non ſequitur, immo contrarium;
                <lb/>
              novus enim, qui præfato globo accederet, impetus ad motum oppoſitum,
                <lb/>
              vel quaſi oppoſitum determinatus, priorem illum ſenſim deſtrueret. </s>
              <s id="s.000683">v. g.
                <lb/>
              impetus novus accedens in P, (
                <emph type="italics"/>
              in anteriori Schemate
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ) partim per PQ, id
                <lb/>
              eſt, versùs ortum, ratione motus centri, partim per tangentem punctum
                <lb/>
              P eſt determinatus; mixta autem linea ſeu determinatio ex vtraque illa
                <lb/>
              ſequitur, vt conſtat ex doctrina motuum. </s>
              <s id="s.000684">Quod verò ſpectat ad tritum
                <lb/>
              illud Mathematicorum dictum, etiam in terræ immobilis hypotheſi locum
                <lb/>
              habet, ſed proſectò nullum planum ita lævigari poteſt, quin aliquot Sa­
                <lb/>
              lebris aſperetur; quod reverà ſufficeret, ad illum impetum deſtruendum;
                <lb/>
              qualis ſit terræ ſuperficies, vides; ille porrò aquæ excurrentis tractus ſenſim
                <lb/>
              fine ſenſu conceptum motum remittit, propter impetum
                <expan abbr="ariū">contrarium</expan>
              impreſ­
                <lb/>
              ſum, vbi enim pervenit in R v.g.cum motus centri ſit contrarius motui
                <lb/>
              orbis, haud dubiè inde aqua aliquo modo regredi cogitur; hinc conflictus;
                <lb/>
              adde mutationem determinationis lineæ motus in ſingulis punctis ſemi­
                <lb/>
              circuli EIF; denique adde aquæ diviſionem, quæ non parum reſiſtit
                <lb/>
              motui, præſertim alterius aquæ; quæ libet autem reſiſtentia impetum ſenſim
                <lb/>
              deſtruit. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000685">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000686"> Iam mentem tuam intelligere mihi videor; vis enim quod­
                <lb/>
              libet punctum terreſtris globi, ratione duplicis motus, centri ſcilicet,
                <lb/>
              atque orbis, duas determinationes habere, quæ in tertiam mixtam de­
                <lb/>
              inde abeunt, perinde atque ſi duplex impetus impreſſus eſſet ad motum
                <lb/>
              mixtum; finge globo, eodem tempore, duplicem impetum imprimi
                <lb/>
              alterum versùs Boream,
                <expan abbr="alterũ">alterum</expan>
              versùs Occaſum, hæc gemina determinatio
                <lb/>
              in eandem motus mixti lineam coaleſcit, vnde ſuppoſita vtriuſque impe­
                <lb/>
              tus æqualitate, globus verſus Corum ibit, id eſt, Boream inter & Occa-</s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum