Fabri, Honoré, Tractatus physicus de motu locali, 1646

List of thumbnails

< >
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
< >
page |< < of 491 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N1137F">
            <pb pagenum="64" xlink:href="026/01/096.jpg"/>
            <p id="N15170" type="main">
              <s id="N15172">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              124.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1517E" type="main">
              <s id="N15180">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Non determinatur noua linea in motu reflexo â priore tantùm linea
                <lb/>
              incidentiæ
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; probatur, quia poteſt eſſe eadem linea incidentiæ cum di­
                <lb/>
              uerſis lineis motus reflexi, vt patet. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1518D" type="main">
              <s id="N1518F">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              125.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1519B" type="main">
              <s id="N1519D">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Non determinatur noua linea motus reflexi ratione tantùm plani reflecten­
                <lb/>
              tis
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              : Probatur, quia cum eodem plano reflectente diuerſæ lineæ motus
                <lb/>
              reflexi eſſe poſſunt, vt conſtat. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N151AA" type="main">
              <s id="N151AC">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              126.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N151B8" type="main">
              <s id="N151BA">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Determinatur noua linea motus reflexi ratione lineæ prioris incidentiæ com­
                <lb/>
              paratæ cum plano reflectente,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              eſt enim angulus reflexionis æqualis angu­
                <lb/>
              lo incidentiæ, cuius effectus rationem aliàs afferemus, cum de motu
                <lb/>
              reflexo; </s>
              <s id="N151C9">& verò multa hîc curſim tantùm perſtringimus, quæ in libro
                <lb/>
              de motu reflexo accuratiſſimè demonſtrabimus; Hìc tantùm dixiſſe ſuf­
                <lb/>
              ficiat determinari mobile in reflexionis puncto ad nouam lineam motus,
                <lb/>
              quod nemo in dubium reuocare poteſt, & propter quid fiat loco citato
                <lb/>
              demonſtrabimus. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N151D5" type="main">
              <s id="N151D7">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              127.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N151E3" type="main">
              <s id="N151E5">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Quando globus in globum æqualem ita impingitur, vt linea directionis per
                <lb/>
              centra vtriuſque ducatur, determinatio noua eſt æqualis priori
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; </s>
              <s id="N151F0">Patet ex­
                <lb/>
              perientia in pilis illis eburneis, quas deſiderat ludus minoris tudiculæ; </s>
              <s id="N151F6">
                <lb/>
              nec eſt vlla ratio, cur determinatio ſit maior potiùs, quàm minor, cum
                <lb/>
              vtraque pila ſit æqualis; </s>
              <s id="N151FD">ſi enim maior eſſet, vel minor; cur potiùs vno
                <lb/>
              gradu, quàm duobus? </s>
              <s id="N15203">quàm tribus? </s>
              <s id="N15206">Præterea, cum reſiſtens, vel im­
                <lb/>
              pediens eſt æquale agenti; </s>
              <s id="N1520C">certe ſicut agens refundit in paſſum totum
                <lb/>
              id, quod habet, id eſt æqualem impetum in intenſione, & æquè velo­
                <lb/>
              cem motum per Th. 60. Ita reſiſtens, vel impediens refundit æquale
                <lb/>
              impedimentum, quod tantùm ſumi poteſt ex æqualitate mobilium; </s>
              <s id="N15218">ſed
                <lb/>
              ex æquali impedimento duci tantùm poteſt æqualis determinatio priori;
                <lb/>
              denique poteſt dari determinatio noua æqualis priori, vt conſtat, ſed
                <lb/>
              aliunde duci non poteſt quàm ex ipſa mobilium æqualitate, modò fiat
                <lb/>
              contactus per lineam connectentem centra. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N15224" type="main">
              <s id="N15226">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              128.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N15232" type="main">
              <s id="N15234">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Hinc ratio manifeſta illius mirifici effectus, ſcilicet quietis pilæ impactæ
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; </s>
              <s id="N1523D">
                <lb/>
              quippe hæc quieſcet illicò ab ictu; </s>
              <s id="N15242">quia ſcilicet, cum noua determina­
                <lb/>
              tio ſit æqualis priori, non eſt vlla ratio, cur alterutra præualeat; </s>
              <s id="N15248">nec
                <lb/>
              etiam poteſt eſſe determinatio communis, ſeu mixta; cur enim potius
                <lb/>
              dextrorſum quam ſiniſtrorſum? </s>
              <s id="N15250">de quo infrà. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N15253" type="main">
              <s id="N15255">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              129.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N15261" type="main">
              <s id="N15263">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Quando linea directionis globi impacti non connectit centra vtriuſquę
                <lb/>
              globi, determinatur noua linea motus tùm à priore linea incidentiæ, tùm à
                <lb/>
              connectente centra, quæ ſcilicet per punctum contactus à centro impacti globi
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>