Foscarini, Paolo Antonio, An epistle to fantoni, 1661

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
< >
page |< < of 33 > >|
1Therefore the two great Lights are to be underſtood in reſpect of
us
, and according to vulgar eſtimation, and not according to the
true
and reall exiſtence of ſuch Bodies.
Secondly, in the ſpeci­
fication
of the Propoſition it is ſaid, The greater Light to rule the
Day
; hereby denoting the Sun; in which the verbal ſenſe of
Scripture
agreeth with the Truth of the Thing; For that the Sun
is
the Greateſt of all Luminaries, and Globes.
But that which
followeth
immediately after, And the leſſer Light to rule the
Night
, meaning the Moon, cannot be taken in the true and real
ſenſe
of the words: For the Moon is not the leſſer Light, but
Mercury; which is not only much leſſer than the Moon, but alſo
than
any other Star.
And if, again, it be ſaid, That the Holy
Text
doth not ſpeak of the Stars, but onely of the Luminaries,
for
that preſently after they are mentioned apart, And the Stars;
and
that what we ſay is true touching the compariſon of the Stars
amongſt
themſelves, but not in reſpect of the Luminaries, name­
ly
, the Sun and Moon: This reply doth diſcover a man to be
utterly
ignorant in theſe Studies, and ſuch who having not the
leaſt
ſmattering in them, doth conceive an abſurd and erroneous
Opinion
of the Cœleſtial Bodies.
For the Moon and Sun, con­
ſidered
in themſelves, and as they appear to us, if they ſhould
be
a far greater diſtance from us, than indeed they are, would be
no
other, nor would appear to us otherwiſe than Stars, as the
reſt
do in the Firmament.
But Great Luminaries they neither

are
, nor ſeem to be, ſave only in reſpect of us: And ſo, on
the
other ſide, the Stars, as to themſelves, are no other than ſo
many
Suns and ſo many Moons; yet are ſo far remote from us,
that
by reaſon of their diſtance they appear thus ſmall, and dim
of
light, as we behold them.
For the greater and leſſer diſtance
of
heavenly Bodies (cæteris paribus) doth augment and diminiſh
their
appearance both as to Magnitude and Light.
And there­
fore
the words which follow in that place of Geneſis, And the
Stars
(as diſtinguiſhing the Stars from the Sun and Moon) are
to
be taken in no other acceptation than that which we have ſpo­
ken
of, namely, according to the ſenſe of the Vulgar, and the
common
manner of ſpeech. For indeed, according to the truth
of
the matter, all Cœleſtial Bodies, being ſhining Globes, are of
a
vaſt bigneſs, to which if we ſhould be ſo neer as we are to the
Moon
, they would ſeem to us of as great, yea a greater magni­
tude
than the Moon: As likewiſe on the contrary, if we were as
far
diſtant from the Sun and Moon, as we are from them, both
Moon
and Sun would ſhew but as ſtars to us.
And yet the
ſplendor
of the Sun would doubtleſs be greater intenſivè than
that
of any other ſtar.
For, although it ſhould be granted that
ſome
ſtars (as thoſe of the Fixed that twinkle) do ſhine of

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index