Foscarini, Paolo Antonio
,
An epistle to fantoni
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 33
>
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 33
>
page
|<
<
of 33
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
067/01/013.jpg
"
pagenum
="
483
"/>
ſed amongſt the unlearned, and according to the appearance of
<
lb
/>
things, and not according to their true Exiſtence. </
s
>
<
s
>In like man
<
lb
/>
ner
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Geneſ.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
1. in the deſcription of the Creation of all things,
<
lb
/>
the Light is ſaid to be made firſt of all, and yet it followeth in
<
lb
/>
the Text,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
And the Evening and the Morning made the firſt day
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
:
<
lb
/>
and a little after the ſeveral Acts of the Creation are diſtinguiſhed
<
lb
/>
and aſſigned to ſeveral days, and concerning each of them it is
<
lb
/>
ſaid in the Text,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
And the Evening and the Morning made the
<
lb
/>
ſecond day
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; and then
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
the third day, the fourth day, &c.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Hence
<
lb
/>
many doubts ariſe, all which I ſhall propound according to the
<
lb
/>
common Syſteme, that it may appear even from the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
H
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ypotheſis
<
lb
/>
of that Syſteme, that the ſacred Scripture ſometimes, for the a
<
lb
/>
voyding of emergent difficulties, is to be underſtood in a vulgar
<
lb
/>
ſenſe and meaning, and in reſpect of us, and not according to
<
lb
/>
the nature of things. </
s
>
<
s
>Which diſtinction even
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
himſelf
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg887
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſeemeth to have hinted, when he ſaith, ^{*}
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Some things are more
<
lb
/>
intelligible to us; others by nature,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
or
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſecundum ſe.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg885
"/>
* Circa Cardi
<
lb
/>
nes Cœli.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg886
"/>
Luke 16.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg887
"/>
Alia ſunt notio
<
lb
/>
ra nobis, alia, no
<
lb
/>
tiora natura, vel
<
lb
/>
ſecundum ſe,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A
<
lb
/>
r ſt. </
s
>
<
s
>lib. 1. Phyſ.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Firſt therefore; If the light were made before heaven, then
<
lb
/>
it rolled about without heaven to the making of the diſtinction
<
lb
/>
of Day and Night. </
s
>
<
s
>Now this is contrary to the very doctrine
<
lb
/>
of theſe men, who affirm that no Cœleſtial Body can be moved
<
lb
/>
unleſſe
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
per accidens,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and by the motion of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
H
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
eaven,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
and as a knot
<
lb
/>
in a board at the motion of the board.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Again, if it be ſaid, that
<
lb
/>
the Light was created at the ſame time with
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
H
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
eaven, and began
<
lb
/>
to be moved with
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
H
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
eaven, another doubt ariſeth, that likewiſe
<
lb
/>
oppoſeth the foreſaid common
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Hypotheſis:
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
For it being ſaid,
<
lb
/>
that Day and Night, Morning and Evening were made, that ſame
<
lb
/>
is either in reſpect of the Univerſe, or onely in reſpect of the
<
lb
/>
Earth and us. </
s
>
<
s
>If ſo be that the Sun turning round (according to
<
lb
/>
the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Hypotheſis
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of the Common Syſteme) doth not cauſe the
<
lb
/>
Night and Day, but only to opacous Bodies which are deſtitute
<
lb
/>
of all other light, but that of the Sun, whilſt in their half part
<
lb
/>
(which is their
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Hemiſphœre)
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and no more, (for that the Suns
<
lb
/>
light paſſeth over but one half of an opacous Body, unleſs a ve
<
lb
/>
ry ſmall matter more in thoſe of leſſer bulk) they are illumina
<
lb
/>
ted by the Suns aſpect, the other half remaining dark and tene
<
lb
/>
broſe, by reaſon of a ſhadow proceeding from its own Body.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>Therefore the diſtinction of dayes by the light of heaven, ac
<
lb
/>
cording to the deſcription of them in the ſacred Scriptures, muſt
<
lb
/>
not be underſtood
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
abſolutely,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſecundum ſe,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Nature her
<
lb
/>
ſelf
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; but in reſpect of the Earth, and of us its inhabitants, and
<
lb
/>
conſequently
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſecundum nos.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
'Tis not therefore new, nor unu
<
lb
/>
ſual in ſacred Scripture to ſpeak of things
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſecundum nos,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and on
<
lb
/>
ly
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in reſpect of us,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſecundum apparentiam
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; but not
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſecundum
<
lb
/>
ſe,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
reinaturam,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
or
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Abſolutely
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simply.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>