Gassendi, Pierre, De motu impresso a motore translato epistulae duae, 1642

List of thumbnails

< >
71
71
72
72
73
73
74
74
75
75
76
76
77
77
78
78
79
79
80
80
< >
page |< < of 158 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="id.000566">
                <pb pagenum="68" xlink:href="027/01/075.jpg"/>
              motum fieri velociorem; impelle tertio, adhûc ve­
                <lb/>
              lociorem; impelle quarto, adhûc magis; atque ita
                <lb/>
              porrô; adeò vt clarum eſſe videatur, velocitatem
                <lb/>
              motus non aliunde increſcere, quàm ex eo, quòd mo­
                <lb/>
              bile dum in motu eſt, de nouo mouetur, ſeu nouum
                <lb/>
              impulſum accipit à cauſa externa. </s>
              <s id="id.000567">Neque verò, cùm
                <lb/>
              impulſum dico, attractum non intelligo: quippe
                <lb/>
              cùm attrahere nihil aliud ſit, quàm recuruato inſtru­
                <lb/>
              mento verſum ſe impellere; & perſpicuum ſit lapi­
                <lb/>
              dem, globumve memoratum tam impelli vno, plu­
                <lb/>
              ribuſve ictibus poſſe, ſi quis ipſum antecedendo cur­
                <lb/>
              uis digitis adigat, quàm ſi ſubſequendo deuexis
                <lb/>
              propellat. </s>
              <s id="id.000568">Tertiò, cùm de motus deorſùm accele­
                <lb/>
              ratione agatur, conſtat iam, ſiue aër ſolus ſupernè
                <lb/>
              impellat, ſiue Terra ſola infernè accerſat, ſiue aër,
                <lb/>
              & Terra ſimùl vireis conferant, non eſſe ſatis, vt la­
                <lb/>
              pidi vnicus initio ictus imprimatur; ſed eſſe neceſſa­
                <lb/>
              rium, vt noui, nouique imprimantur continuò; alio­
                <lb/>
              quin enim lapis non acceleraret gradum, ſed ferre­
                <lb/>
              tur motu vt æquabili, ita imperceptibili; ſegniſſimo
                <lb/>
              videlicet, propter tenuïtatem ſimplicis conatus,
                <lb/>
              ſeu vnici ictus penè nullam vim. </s>
              <s id="id.000569">Cùm verò ſeu ſola
                <lb/>
              impulſio, ſeu ſola attractio ad accelerationem ſuffi­
                <lb/>
              ciat; quid-nam cauſæ eſſe putabis, cur cenſeam
                <lb/>
              vtramque eſſe coniungendam? </s>
              <s id="id.000570">Nempe in cauſa pro­
                <lb/>
              portio eſt, qua dictum eſt antè accelerationem fieri,
                <lb/>
              Nam fac vnicam eſſe cauſam, exempli gratiâ attra­
                <lb/>
              ctionem; concipies quidem ex dictis ſequi, vt quia
                <lb/>
              radij magnetici, quaſi ſtringentes chordulæ, con­
                <lb/>
              tinentem motum, ſiue impetum lapidi imprimunt, </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>