Salusbury, Thomas, Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I), 1667

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 241]
[Figure 242]
[Figure 243]
[Figure 244]
[Figure 245]
[Figure 246]
[Figure 247]
[Figure 248]
[Figure 249]
[Figure 250]
[Figure 251]
[Figure 252]
[Figure 253]
[Figure 254]
[Figure 255]
[Figure 256]
[Figure 257]
[Figure 258]
[Figure 259]
[Figure 260]
[Figure 261]
[Figure 262]
[Figure 263]
[Figure 264]
[Figure 265]
[Figure 266]
[Figure 267]
[Figure 268]
[Figure 269]
[Figure 270]
< >
page |< < of 701 > >|
1the ſaid K ω in H, and A S is parallel unto the Line that toucheth
in P; It is neceſſary that P I hath unto P H either the ſame propor­
tion that N ω hath to ω O, or greater; for this hath already been
demonſtrated.] Where this is demonſtrated either by Archimedes himſelf, or by
any other, doth not appear; touching which we will here inſert a Demonſtration, after that
we have explained ſome things that pertaine thereto.
C
LEMMA I.
Let the Lines A B and A C contain the Angle B A C; and from
the point D, taken in the Line A C, draw D E and D F at
pleaſure unto A B: and in the ſame Line any Points G and L
being taken, draw G H & L M parallel to D E, & G K and
L N parallel unto F D: Then from the Points D & G as farre
as to the Line M L draw D O P, cutting G H in O, and G Q
parallel unto B A.
I ſay that the Lines that lye betwixt the Pa­
rallels unto F D have unto thoſe that lye betwixt the Par­
allels unto D E (namely K N to G Q or to O P; F K to D O;
and F N to D P) the ſame mutuall proportion: that is to ſay,
the ſame that A F hath to A E.
For in regard that the Triangles A F D, A K G, and A N L
257[Figure 257]
are alike, and E F D, H K G, and M N L are alſo alike: There-

fore, (a) as A F is to F D, ſo ſhall A K be to K G; and as F D is to
F E, ſo ſhall K G be to K H: Wherefore, ex equali, as A F is to F
E, ſo ſhall A K be to K H: And, by Converſion of proportion, as
A F is to A E, ſo ſhall A K be to K H.
It is in the ſame manner
proved that, as A F is to A E, ſo ſhall A N be to A M.
Now A

N being to A M, as A K is to A H; The (b) Remainder K N ſhall
be unto the Remainder H M, that is unto G Q, or unto O P, as
A N is to A M; that is, as A F is to A E: Again, A K is to
A H, as A F is to A E; Therefore the Remainder F K ſhall be to
the Remainder E H, namely to D O, as A F is to A E.
We might in
like manner demonstrate that ſo is F N to D P: Which is that that
was required to be demonstrated.
(a) By 4. of the
ſixth.
(b) By 5. of the
fifth.
LEMMA II.
In the ſame Line A B let there be two Points R and S, ſo diſpo­
ſed, that A S may have the ſame Proportion to A R that
A F hath to A E; and thorow R draw R T parallel to E D,
and thorow S draw S T parallel to F D, ſo, as that it may
meet with R T in the Point T.
I ſay that the Point T fall­
eth in the Line A C.

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index