Benedetti, Giovanni Battista de, Io. Baptistae Benedicti ... Diversarvm specvlationvm mathematicarum, et physicarum liber : quarum seriem sequens pagina indicabit ; [annotated and critiqued by Guidobaldo Del Monte]

Table of contents

< >
[2.9.] CAP. IX.
Page: 141 (129)
[2.10.] CAP.X.
Page: 142 (130)
[2.11.] CAP. XI. ALITER IDEM.
Page: 143 (131)
[2.12.] JACOBO SOLDATO MEDIOLANENSI Serenißimi Ducis Sabaudiæ Architecto peritißimo. CAP. VII.
Page: 145 (133)
[2.13.] AD EVNDEM IACOBVM. CAP. XIII.
Page: 149 (137)
[2.14.] CAP. XIIII.
Page: 150 (138)
[2.15.] CAP. XV.
Page: 152 (140)
[3.] DE MECHANICIS.
Page: 153 (141)
[3.1.] De differentia ſitus brachiorum libra. CAP.I.
Page: 153 (141)
[3.2.] De proportione ponderis extremitatis brachij libr & in diuerſo ſitu ab orizontali. CAP. II.
Page: 154 (142)
[3.3.] Quòd quantit as cuiuſlibet ponderis, aut uirtus mouens re-ſpectu alterius quantitatis cognoſcatur beneficio perpendicularium ductarum à centro libr & ad line am inclinationis. CAP. III.
Page: 155 (143)
[3.4.] Quemadmodum exſupradictis cauſis omnes staterarum & uectium cauſæ dependeant. CAP. IIII.
Page: 156 (144)
[3.5.] De quibuſdam rebus animaduerſione dignis. CAP.V.
Page: 157 (145)
[3.6.] De ratione cuiuſdam uis adauctæ. CAP. VI.
Page: 158 (146)
[3.7.] De quibuſdam erroribus Nicolai Tartaleæ circa pondera corporum & eorum motus, quorum aliqui deſumpti fuerunt à fordano ſcriptore quodam antiquo. CAP. VII.
Page: 160 (148)
[3.8.] CAP. VIII.
Page: 161 (149)
[3.9.] Quòdſummaratione ſtateræper æqualia interualla ſint diuiſæ. CAP. IX.
Page: 163 (151)
[3.10.] Quòd line a circularis non habe at concauum cum con-uexo coniunctum, & quod Aristo. cir caproportio nes motuum aberrauerit. CAP.X.
Page: 164 (152)
[3.11.] Quod Aristo. in prima mechanicarum quæstionum eius quod inquir it, uer am cauſam non attulerit. CAP. XI.
Page: 165 (153)
[3.12.] De uer a cauſa ſecundæ, & tertiæ quæstionis mechanicæ ab Ariſtotele nonperſpecta. CAP. XII.
Page: 166 (154)
[3.13.] Quòd Ariſtotelisratio in 6. quæſtione poſit a non ſit admittenda. CAP. XIII.
Page: 167 (155)
[3.14.] Quòdrationes ab Ariſtotele de octaua quæstione confictæ ſufficient es non ſint. CAP. XIIII.
Page: 167 (155)
[3.15.] Quod Aristotelis ratio none queſtionis admittendanon ſit. CAP. XV.
Page: 171 (159)
[3.16.] Quod Aristotelis rationes de decima queſtione ſint reijciende. CAP. XVI.
Page: 171 (159)
[3.17.] De uer a cauſa .12. questionis mechanice. CAP. XVII.
Page: 172 (160)
[3.18.] De decimatertia questione. CAP. XVIII.
Page: 173 (161)
[3.19.] De decimaquart a queſtione. CAP. XIX.
Page: 173 (161)
[3.20.] De uer a r atione .17. queſtionis. CAP. XX.
Page: 174 (162)
[3.21.] De uera & intrinſeca cauſa trocble arum. CAP. XXI.
Page: 175 (163)
[3.22.] Depropria cauſa .24. quæſtionis. CAP. XXII.
Page: 177 (165)
< >
page |< < (154) of 445 > >|
    <echo version="1.0">
      <text type="book" xml:lang="la">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div7" type="body" level="1" n="1">
          <div xml:id="echoid-div340" type="chapter" level="2" n="3">
            <div xml:id="echoid-div362" type="section" level="3" n="11">
              <pb o="154" rhead="IO. BAPT. BENED." n="166" file="0166" xlink:href="http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/zogilib?fn=/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg/0166"/>
            </div>
            <div xml:id="echoid-div363" type="section" level="3" n="12">
              <head xml:id="echoid-head216" style="it" xml:space="preserve">De uer a cauſa ſecundæ, & tertiæ quæstionis mechanicæ
                <lb/>
              ab Ariſtotele nonperſpecta.</head>
              <head xml:id="echoid-head217" xml:space="preserve">CAP. XII.</head>
              <p>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1832" xml:space="preserve">ARiſtoteles in ſecunda quæſtionum mechanicarum quærens illius rationem ſic
                  <lb/>
                ſcribit.</s>
              </p>
              <p>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1833" xml:space="preserve">Cur ſiquidem ſurſum fuerit ſpartum quando deorſum lato pondere quiſpiam id
                  <lb/>
                admouet rurſus aſcendit libra: </s>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1834" xml:space="preserve">ſi autem deorſum conſtitutum fuerit non aſcendit,
                  <lb/>
                ſed manet? </s>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1835" xml:space="preserve">an quia ſurſum quidem ſparto exiſtente plus libræ extra perpendiculum
                  <lb/>
                ſi (ſpartum enim eſt perpendiculum) quare neceſſe eſt deorſum ferriid, quod plus
                  <lb/>
                eſt, quare & cætera.</s>
              </p>
              <p>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1836" xml:space="preserve">Sed vera cauſa, vnde fiat, vt ſi ſpartum fuerit ſurſum, & brachium vnum
                  <lb/>
                ipfius libræ deprimendo, & idem liberum deinde permittendo, ad ſitum ori-
                  <lb/>
                zontalem redeat, non ſolum eſt maior quantitas ponderis brachiorum quæ iam præ
                  <lb/>
                tergreſſa eſt vltra verticalem lineam, ſed etiam eſt longitudo brachij eleuati, quæ vl
                  <lb/>
                tra verticalem lineam reperitur, vnde eius extremi pondus redditur grauius in pro-
                  <lb/>
                portione, quam in hoc exemplo proponam, ſit
                  <var>.A.B.</var>
                libra in ſitu orizontali, cuius
                  <lb/>
                ſpartum ſit
                  <var>.E.</var>
                ſuper ipſam. </s>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1837" xml:space="preserve">& deprimentes brachium ipſius
                  <var>.A.</var>
                vſque ad
                  <var>.F.</var>
                eius ſitus
                  <lb/>
                ſit in
                  <var>.F.H.</var>
                vnde medium
                  <reg norm="punctum" type="context">pũctum</reg>
                  <var>.G.</var>
                prætergreſſum erit lineam verticalem
                  <var>.V.Z.</var>
                ver
                  <lb/>
                ſus
                  <var>.B.</var>
                quæ
                  <var>.V.Z.</var>
                ſecabit brachium
                  <var>.F.G.</var>
                in puncto
                  <var>.D.</var>
                vnde
                  <var>.D.H.</var>
                longius erit ipſo
                  <var>.
                    <lb/>
                  F.D</var>
                . </s>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1838" xml:space="preserve">Nunc nobis ſupponendum eſt id,
                  <lb/>
                quod veriſſimum exiſtit, dictam ſcilicet li
                  <lb/>
                  <figure xlink:label="fig-0166-01" xlink:href="fig-0166-01a" number="224">
                    <image file="0166-01" xlink:href="http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/zogilib?fn=/permanent/library/163127KK/figures/0166-01"/>
                  </figure>
                bram in ſitu
                  <var>.F.H.</var>
                  <reg norm="etiam" type="context">etiã</reg>
                ſi ſuſtineatur à pun-
                  <lb/>
                cto
                  <var>.E.</var>
                idem tamen futurum ac ſi ſuſtenta-
                  <lb/>
                retur in puncto
                  <var>.D.</var>
                vnde ſequitur, quod
                  <lb/>
                pondus appenſum ex ipſa
                  <var>.H.</var>
                ita grauius
                  <lb/>
                reddatur, ipſo
                  <var>.F.</var>
                in eadem propor-
                  <lb/>
                tione, quæ maioreſt
                  <var>.D.H.</var>
                ipſo
                  <var>.D.F.</var>
                ob
                  <lb/>
                rationes quas in primis huius tractatus ca-
                  <lb/>
                pitibus poſui, vt etiam ſi
                  <var>.D.H.</var>
                quodmate
                  <lb/>
                riale eſſe ſupponitur, nullam planſe4; </s>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1839" xml:space="preserve">graui-
                  <lb/>
                tatem haberet,
                  <reg norm="ſolustamem" type="context">ſolustamẽ</reg>
                exceſſus vis pon
                  <lb/>
                deris in
                  <var>.H.</var>
                poſiti, longè maior pondere in
                  <lb/>
                F. collocato pro maiorilongitudine ipſius
                  <lb/>
                  <var>D.H.</var>
                ſufficiat. ad præſtandum vt libra ad
                  <lb/>
                ſitum orizontalem redeat.</s>
              </p>
              <p>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1840" xml:space="preserve">In ſecunda deinde huius quęſtionis par
                  <lb/>
                  <handwritten xlink:label="hd-0166-01" xlink:href="hd-0166-01a" number="13"/>
                te, in qua ſcribit libram in ſitu, in quo poſi
                  <lb/>
                ta eſt, firmam manere, toto cęlo aberrat, quia
                  <reg norm="neceſſarium" type="context">neceſſariũ</reg>
                eſt, vt omninò cadat, eò
                  <reg norm="uſque" type="simple">uſq;</reg>
                  <lb/>
                quò ſpartum ſurſum remaneat: </s>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1841" xml:space="preserve">ablato tamen omni impedimento, quod nulla eget
                  <lb/>
                probatione, cum natura ſua clariſſimè pateat.</s>
              </p>
              <p>
                <s xml:id="echoid-s1842" xml:space="preserve">Cauſa, deinde, vera tertiæ quæſtionis non eſt ea, quam Ariſtoteles ponit, ſed hu-
                  <lb/>
                iuſmodi effectus ab eo, quod capitibus .4. et .5. huius tractatus propoſui originem
                  <lb/>
                habet.</s>
              </p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum