Archimedes, Natation of bodies, 1662

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 21]
[Figure 22]
[Figure 23]
[Figure 24]
[Figure 25]
[Figure 26]
[Figure 27]
[Figure 28]
[Figure 29]
[Figure 30]
[Figure 31]
[Figure 32]
[Figure 33]
[Figure 34]
[Figure 35]
[Figure 36]
[Figure 37]
[Figure 38]
[Figure 39]
[Figure 40]
[Figure 41]
[Figure 42]
[Figure 43]
[Figure 44]
[Figure 45]
[Figure 46]
[Figure 47]
[Figure 48]
[Figure 49]
[Figure 50]
< >
page |< < of 68 > >|
124[Figure 24]
Angle K H M: Therefore (f) O G and H N are parallel,

and the (g) Angle H N F equall to the Angle O G F; for
that
G O being Perpendicular to E F, H N ſhall alſo be per-

pandicnlar to the ſame: Which was to be demon ſtrated.
(a) By Cor. of 8. of
6
. of Euclide.
(b) By 17. of the
6
.
(c) By 14. of the
6
.
(d) By 33. of the
1
.
(e) By 4. of the 1.
(f) By 28. of the
1
.
(g) By 29. of th
1
In the Antient Parabola (namely that aſſumed in a Rightangled
Cone
) the Line juxta quam Poſſunt quæ in Sectione ordinatim du­
cuntur
(which I, following Mydorgius, do call the Parameter) is (a)

double to that quæ ducta eſt à Vertice Sectionis uſque ad Axem, or in
Archimedes
phraſe, τᾱς υσ́χρι τοῡ ἄξον<34>; which I for that cauſe, and
for
want of a better word, name the Semiparameter: but in Modern
Parabola's it is greater or leſſer then double. Now that throughout this
Book
Archimedes ſpeaketh of the Parabola in a Rectangled Cone, is mani­
feſt
both by the firſt words of each Propoſition, & by this that no Parabola
hath
its Parameter double to the Line quæ eſt a Sectione ad Axem, ſave
that
which is taken in a Rightangled Cone.
And in any other Parabola, for
the
Line τᾱς μσ́χριτοῡ ἄεον<34> or quæ uſque ad Axem to uſurpe the Word Se­
miparameter
would be neither proper nor true: but in this caſe it may paſs
(a) Rîvalt. in Ar­
chimed
. de Cunoid
& Sphæroid. Prop.
3. Lem. 1.
PROP. III. THEOR. III.

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index