Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[Item 1.]
[2.] Ex Libris James S. Dearden Rampside
[3.] A DISCOVERY OF A New , OR,
[4.] In Two Parts.
[5.] The Fifth Edition Corrected and Amended. LONDON,
[6.] The Epiſtle to the READER.
[7.] The Propoſitions that are proved in this Diſcourſe. PROPOSITION I.
[8.] PROP. II.
[9.] PROP. III.
[10.] PROP. IV.
[11.] PROP. V.
[12.] PROP. VI.
[13.] PROP. VII.
[14.] PROP. VIII.
[15.] PROP. IX.
[16.] PROP. X.
[17.] PROP. XI.
[18.] PROP. XII.
[19.] PROP. XIII.
[20.] PROP. XIV.
[21.] The Firſt Book. That the MOON May be a WORLD. The Firſt Propoſition, by way of Preface.
[22.] Sed vanus ſtolidis hæc omnia finxerit Error.
[23.] Solis lunæq; labores.
[24.] Cum fruſtra reſonant æra auxiliaria Lunæ.
[25.] Una laboranti poterit ſuccerrere Lunæ.
[26.] Gantus & è cælo poſſunt deducere Lunam.
[27.] Cantus & ſi curru lunam deducere tentant, Et facerent, ſi non æra repulſa ſonant.
[28.] PROP. II. That a Plurality of Worlds doth not contradict any Principle of Reaſon or Faith.
[29.] Æſtuas infelix auguſto limite mundi.
[30.] PROP. III. That the Heavens do not conſiſt of any ſuch pure Matter, which can priviledge them from the like Change and Corruption, as theſe Inferiour, Bodies are liable unto.
< >
page |< < (113) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div296" type="section" level="1" n="63">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4376" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="113" file="0293" n="293" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            about by its meer motion, (if there were
              <lb/>
            nothing elſe) ſo little a part of the adjoin-
              <lb/>
            ing Air, as is here repreſented: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4377" xml:space="preserve">And yet,</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4378" xml:space="preserve">1. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4379" xml:space="preserve">The diſproportion betwixt the thick-
              <lb/>
            neſs of the Earth, and this Orb of Air, is
              <lb/>
            far greater than could be expreſt in the Fi-
              <lb/>
            gure, being but as twenty miles, which is
              <lb/>
            at moſt the thickneſs of this Air, unto 3456
              <lb/>
            miles, which is the Semidiameter of our
              <lb/>
            Earth, and ſo is but as an inſenſible number
              <lb/>
            in reſpect of this other.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4380" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4381" xml:space="preserve">2. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4382" xml:space="preserve">Beſides the meer motion of the Earth,
              <lb/>
            which in probability (being ſuch a rugged
              <lb/>
            Body) might be enough to carry ſo little a
              <lb/>
            part of the Air along with it; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4383" xml:space="preserve">there is alſo
              <lb/>
            (as we ſuppoſe) a magnetical vigour which
              <lb/>
            proceeds from it, whereby ’tis more able to
              <lb/>
            make all things that are near unto it, to ob-
              <lb/>
            ſerve the ſame Revolution.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4384" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4385" xml:space="preserve">But if it be ſo (ſaith Alex. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4386" xml:space="preserve">Roſſ.) </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4387" xml:space="preserve">
              <note symbol="*" position="right" xlink:label="note-0293-01" xlink:href="note-0293-01a" xml:space="preserve">Lib. 1.
                <lb/>
              ſect. 1. c. 5.</note>
            not only the Man, but the Medium alſo, and
              <lb/>
            the Object be moved, this muſt needs be
              <lb/>
            ſuch a great hindrance to the ſight, that the
              <lb/>
            Eye cannot judg exactly of any thing. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4388" xml:space="preserve">For
              <lb/>
            ſuppoſe the Man alone to be in a motion, he
              <lb/>
            could not ſee ſo well as when he is ſtill; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4389" xml:space="preserve">but
              <lb/>
            now, if not only he, but his Spectacles,
              <lb/>
            and Book, were all moved, he would not
              <lb/>
            be able to diſcern any thing diſtinctly.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4390" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4391" xml:space="preserve">I anfwer: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4392" xml:space="preserve">The Conſequence were perti-
              <lb/>
            nent, if all theſe were ſeveral motions: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4393" xml:space="preserve">but
              <lb/>
            if the Subject, and Medium, and Object,
              <lb/>
            were all carried with one and the ſame equal
              <lb/>
            motion, (as it is here ſuppoſed) this </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>