Fabri, Honoré, Tractatus physicus de motu locali, 1646

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 11]
[Figure 12]
[Figure 13]
[Figure 14]
[Figure 15]
[Figure 16]
[Figure 17]
[Figure 18]
[Figure 19]
[Figure 20]
[Figure 21]
[Figure 22]
[Figure 23]
[Figure 24]
[Figure 25]
[Figure 26]
[Figure 27]
[Figure 28]
[Figure 29]
[Figure 30]
[Figure 31]
[Figure 32]
[Figure 33]
[Figure 34]
[Figure 35]
[Figure 36]
[Figure 37]
[Figure 38]
[Figure 39]
[Figure 40]
< >
page |< < of 491 > >|
1que lege, vt impetus agat quantum poteſt, & omnes partes mobilis
moueantur æquali motu.
Corollarium 1.
Hinc reijcis illos, qui volunt à globo æquali produci in æquali ſub­
duplum impetum; in ſubduplo ſubtriplum; in ſubquadruplo ſubquin­
tuplum; ratio illorum eſt;
quia duo globi æquales inſtanti contactus
perinde ſe habent, atque ſi conflarent vnum corpus;
ſed ſi conflarent
vnum corpus quilibet ſubduplum impetum haberet;
ſi verò globus cum
alio ſubduplo faceret vnum mobile;
haud dubiè minor, id eſt, ſubduplus
haberet tantùm ſubtriplum impetum; atque ita deinceps;
hoc totum
falſiſſimum eſt;
nam primò ſi globus æqualis acciperet tantùm ſubdu­
plum impetum ab alio, ſubduplo tantùm motu ferretur;
igitur ſubdu­
plum ſpatium decurreret, quod eſt contra experientiam, & Th. 47. Se­
cundò, ratio propoſita nulla eſt;
quia quando globus impactus impellit
alium, eſt veluti potentiâ, quæ cum tota ſua vi, & cum impetu agit,
cuius nulla pars transfertur in alium globum;
nec enim migrat de
de ſubiecto in ſubiectum, ſed producit ſibi æqualem:
equidem ſi duo
globi æquales eſſent vel coniuncti, vel contigui in linea directionis,
quilibet pro rata acciperet impetus producti partem à potentia applica­
ta;
ſi eſſent æquales, quiſque ſubduplum: ſi alter ſubduplus ſubtri­
plum, &c.
ſed hæc ſunt ſatis facilia.
Obijci fortè poſſet ab aliquo primò experientia; videmus enim ſæpè
globum impulſum in ludo Tudiculario moueri tardiùs globo impellen­
te;
reſpondeo id ſæpè accidere; tùm quia linea directionis non connec­
tit centra vtriuſque globi;
igitur minor eſt ictus per Th 52. tùm quia
globus impellens, vel impulſus deficiunt à perfecta ſphæra;
tùm quia
non eſt perfecta æqualitas globorum; adde quod quò accuratiùs prædi­
ctæ leges obſeruantur, ipſi motus ad æqualitatem propiùs accedunt, vt
conſtat experientia.
Obiici poſſet ſecundò deſtrui aliquid impetus globi impellentis ab ipſo
ictu, vt conſtat experientia;
igitur illa pars impetus, quæ deſtruitur, non
producit nouum impetum in globo impulſo;
Reſpondeo deſtrui quidem
aliquid impetus in globo impacto, vt videbimus infrà;
cum tamen de­
ſtruatur tantùm ſequenti poſt ictum inſtanti;
certè cum exiſtat adhuc
ipſo inſtanti contactus, neceſſariò agit, quippe aliquid vltimo inſtanti
poteſt agere;
adde quod illud ipſum repugnat manifeſtæ experientiæ;
licèt enim aliquando deſtruatur totus impetus in globo impacto, quod
ſæpè accidit in ludo Tudiculario, nam illicò ſiſtit pila eburnea; alius
tamen globus velociter mouetur, cuius effectus rationem infrà addu­
cemus.
Obijci poſſet tertiò inde ſequi progreſſum in infinitum, nam globus
A impactus in globum B impellet cum æquali motu, & B in C etiam
æquali, C in D, atque ita deinceps;
modò illi globi ita ſtatuantur, vt
linea directionis per omnium centra rectà ducatur;
Reſpondeo, vel il-

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index